From: Stanislav Meduna <stano@meduna.org>
To: "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] Re: timerfd read does not return
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 09:35:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5174E842.4050408@meduna.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5171A0D0.8050100@meduna.org>
On 19.04.2013 21:53, Stanislav Meduna wrote:
>> There is no return from the read until the RT throttler got activated.
>> Kernel version 3.4.25-rt37 - I'll check whether anything relevant
>> has changed since then.
FWIW, the following patch seems to solve the issue for me.
Unfortunately I have no idea whether this is a sane way to
do and whether it solves or just masks or delays the issue,
I just decided to try it after seeing http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/8/487
Note that in my case the ksoftirqd has lower priority than
the thread reading the timerfd, so the latter gets woken up
immediately and it is well possible and usual that it returns
into the kernel to do another read before the hrtimer softirq
ends. Would it be possible that there is some race in this
situation?
diff --git a/fs/timerfd.c b/fs/timerfd.c
index 57f0e4e..b06ba86 100644
--- a/fs/timerfd.c
+++ b/fs/timerfd.c
@@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ static ssize_t timerfd_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count,
ctx->ticks = 0;
}
spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->wqh.lock);
+ hrtimer_wait_for_timer(&ctx->tmr);
if (ticks)
res = put_user(ticks, (u64 __user *) buf) ? -EFAULT: sizeof(ticks);
return res;
Thanks
--
Stano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-22 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-15 11:02 hrtimer: interrupt took 6742 ns, then RT throttling and hung machine for nearly 2 seconds Stanislav Meduna
2013-04-15 11:54 ` Stanislav Meduna
2013-04-15 12:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-04-15 12:56 ` Stanislav Meduna
2013-04-17 15:46 ` timerfd and softirqd [Was: Re: hrtimer: interrupt took 6742 ns, then RT throttling and hung machine for nearly 2 seconds] Stanislav Meduna
2013-04-18 9:11 ` timerfd read does not return [Was: Re: timerfd and softirqd] Stanislav Meduna
2013-04-19 19:53 ` Stanislav Meduna
2013-04-22 7:35 ` Stanislav Meduna [this message]
2013-04-22 8:55 ` [PATCH] Re: timerfd read does not return Stanislav Meduna
2013-04-27 8:34 ` timerfd read does not return - was probably fixed in 3.4.38 Stanislav Meduna
2013-04-28 11:53 ` Carsten Emde
2013-04-29 8:43 ` Stanislav Meduna
2013-05-02 20:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-05-10 12:42 ` timerfd read does not return - some traces Stanislav Meduna
2013-05-12 17:31 ` Stanislav Meduna
2013-05-12 23:20 ` timerfd read does not return - hangs inside put_user Stanislav Meduna
2013-05-13 8:05 ` timerfd read does not return - caused by MM fault Stanislav Meduna
2013-05-14 8:31 ` Livelock in handle_pte_fault [Was: Re: timerfd read does not return] Stanislav Meduna
2013-11-25 10:36 ` Vijay Katoch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5174E842.4050408@meduna.org \
--to=stano@meduna.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.