From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:12:08 +0200
Subject: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: refactor scan locking
In-Reply-To: <87wqrvkmwm.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
References: <1366273633-2926-1-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com>
	<1366273633-2926-3-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com>
	<87wqrvkmwm.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Message-ID: <5174F0D8.3060602@tieto.com>
List-Id: <ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

On 22/04/13 10:08, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com> writes:
>
>> Since we have data_lock it is no longer necessary
>> to have scan.lock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
>> ---
>
> [...]
>
>>   	ret = ath10k_wmi_stop_scan(ar, &arg);
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		ath10k_warn("%s: ath10k_wmi_stop_scan failed (%d)\n", __func__, ret);
>>
>> +	ath10k_wmi_flush_tx(ar);
>
> Is this by accident?

Oh. I noticed we were missing it. Must've mixed it into the patch. 
Should I resend the patches split?


-- Pozdrawiam / Best regards, Michal Kazior.