From: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
To: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
"patches@linaro.org" <patches@linaro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@linaro.org>,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
"linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] drm/exynos: prepare FIMD clocks
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:05:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51750B7D.3050401@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1731019.P1JXV7Hkkn@amdc1227>
On 04/22/2013 11:56 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Monday 22 of April 2013 10:44:00 Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 21 April 2013 20:13, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 3) after those two changes, all that remains is to fix compliance with
>>> Common Clock Framework, in other words:
>>>
>>> s/clk_enable/clk_prepare_enable/
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> s/clk_disable/clk_disable_unprepare/
>>
>> We don't have to call clk_{un}prepare() everytime for your platform as
>> you aren't doing anything in it. So just call them once at probe/remove and
>> call clk_enable/disable everywhere else.
Yes, I agree with that. Additionally clk_(un)prepare must not be called in
atomic context, so some drivers will have to work like this anyway.
Or the clocks could be prepared/unprepared in the device open/close file op
for instance.
> Can you assure that in future SoCs, on which this driver will be used, this
> assumption will still hold true or even that in current Exynos driver this
> behavior won't be changed?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-22 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-08 11:07 [PATCH v4] drm/exynos: prepare FIMD clocks Vikas Sajjan
2013-04-08 11:11 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-19 8:55 ` Vikas Sajjan
2013-04-20 15:26 ` Inki Dae
2013-04-21 7:24 ` Vikas Sajjan
2013-04-21 7:53 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-21 10:35 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-04-21 14:05 ` Inki Dae
2013-04-21 14:15 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-04-21 10:26 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-04-21 13:36 ` Inki Dae
2013-04-21 14:43 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-04-22 5:11 ` Inki Dae
2013-04-22 9:52 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-04-22 10:03 ` Inki Dae
2013-04-22 10:17 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-04-22 10:20 ` Inki Dae
2013-04-22 10:37 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-04-22 11:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-22 12:04 ` Inki Dae
2013-04-23 11:51 ` myungjoo.ham
2013-04-23 12:09 ` Inki Dae
2013-04-22 11:52 ` Inki Dae
2013-04-22 5:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-22 9:56 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-04-22 10:05 ` Sylwester Nawrocki [this message]
2013-04-22 12:30 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-04-22 10:26 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51750B7D.3050401@samsung.com \
--to=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=vikas.sajjan@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.