From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5 v2] net/cpsw: don't rely only on netif_running() to check which device is active
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:19:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51750EB9.6090009@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51750D1B.4060600@ti.com>
On 04/22/2013 12:12 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote:
>
> Yes, when interrupt is disabled in hardware then interrupt must be
> disabled.
> In my initial days i have verified it, CPSW doesn't allow any new
> interrupts to
> propagate to arm if CPSW interrupt is disabled which is correct. CPSW irq
> signal is not directly connected to irq controller, it is connected via
> edge to
> level conversion so it is a kind of latched interrupt and so the
> interrupt has
> to be disabled in interrupt controller to disable the interrupt, else
> arm get
> blocked in CPSW ISR.
>
> This behavior is not only in AM335x CPSW, it is as is from its previous
> versions in TI814x and TI8107.
And I don't see this on ES1.0 because they forgot to add the
edge-to-level converter?
> Regards
> Mugunthan V N
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-22 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-17 21:52 my small cpsw queue Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-17 21:52 ` [PATCH 1/5] net/davinci_cpdma: don't check for jiffies with interrupts Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-18 11:49 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-17 21:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] net/cpsw: don't continue if we miss to allocate rx skbs Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-18 11:50 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-18 12:09 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-19 10:40 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-22 8:05 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-17 21:52 ` [PATCH 3/5] net/cpsw: don't rely on netif_running() to check which device is active Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-18 11:50 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-18 12:10 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-19 10:35 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-22 8:30 ` [PATCH 3/5 v2] net/cpsw: don't rely only " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-22 9:14 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-22 9:30 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-22 9:40 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-22 9:49 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-22 10:12 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-22 10:19 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2013-04-22 19:21 ` David Miller
2013-04-19 13:10 ` [PATCH 3/5] net/cpsw: don't rely " Sergei Shtylyov
2013-04-22 8:33 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-17 21:52 ` [PATCH 4/5] net/davinci_cpdma: remove unused argument in cpdma_chan_submit() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-18 11:51 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-17 21:52 ` [PATCH 5/5] net/cpsw: redo rx skb allocation in rx path Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-18 11:50 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-18 12:13 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-19 10:28 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-18 14:59 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51750EB9.6090009@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=mugunthanvnm@ti.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.