From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co1ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.185]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E66E014F3 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 05:08:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail215-co1-R.bigfish.com (10.243.78.229) by CO1EHSOBE029.bigfish.com (10.243.66.94) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:08:55 +0000 Received: from mail215-co1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail215-co1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC937E01A1; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:08:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:mail.freescale.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -5 X-BigFish: VS-5(zzbb2dI98dI9371I1dbaI1432Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz8275bhz2dh2a8h668h839h947hd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h1765h18e1h190ch1946h19b4h19c3h1ad9h1b0ah1155h) Received: from mail215-co1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail215-co1 (MessageSwitch) id 1366632533441716_28412; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CO1EHSMHS025.bigfish.com (unknown [10.243.78.242]) by mail215-co1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64EA1D6005F; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.freescale.net (70.37.183.190) by CO1EHSMHS025.bigfish.com (10.243.66.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:08:52 +0000 Received: from az84smr01.freescale.net (10.64.34.197) by 039-SN1MMR1-001.039d.mgd.msft.net (10.84.1.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.328.11; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:08:51 +0000 Received: from [10.29.244.97] ([10.29.244.97]) by az84smr01.freescale.net (8.14.3/8.14.0) with ESMTP id r3MC8oRA008109; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 05:08:50 -0700 Message-ID: <5175281A.2070403@freescale.com> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 09:07:54 -0300 From: Daiane Angolini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador References: <1366630985-12325-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <1366630985-12325-2-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <517525A6.9040402@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm PATCH 2/6] linux-fslc: Update to patches-3.8's snapshot from 20130420 X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:08:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04/22/2013 09:01 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Daiane Angolini > wrote: >> On 04/22/2013 08:43 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> >>> This features the following updates: >>> >>> * Merge of 3.8.8 stable release >>> * Fix for i.MX233 OlinuXino MMC boot >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador >>> --- >>> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.8.bb | 4 ++-- >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.8.bb >>> b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.8.bb >>> index 68fa8e1..de39564 100644 >>> --- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.8.bb >>> +++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.8.bb >>> @@ -4,9 +4,9 @@ >>> include linux-fslc.inc >>> >>> PV = "3.8+git${SRCPV}" >>> -PR = "r5" >>> +PR = "r6" >> >> >> Why some recipes you bump PR and some other you do not? > > Auto pilot! :-) This PR bump can be removed. > >>> # patches-3.8 >>> -SRCREV = "9674b8d96fca62bc47be48fd857591dcfca874b1" >>> +SRCREV = "7fd77a4db4dc59f98a7118fdbbf02d82b03de1de" >>> >>> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(mxs|mx3|mx5|mx6)" >> >> >> Will you keep "mxs" as compatible machine? (instead of mx28 and mx23, I >> mean) > > This works for both so 'mxs' is the shortest variation of it. I see no > reason to replace 'mxs' to 'mx23:mx28' when the support is for both > SoCs. > > What do you think? I completely agree. My intend was to make it clean and explicit for everyone. -- Daiane