From: Daiane Angolini <daiane.angolini@freescale.com>
To: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List <meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm PATCH 1/6] u-boot-fslc: Update to patches-2013.04's 20130420 snapshot
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 09:21:50 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51752B5E.1050204@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKp_w051KiN6Q8EfeaBj2hhMeFSp2R3vQzC17Z2TU4R9ag@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/22/2013 09:05 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Daiane Angolini
> <daiane.angolini@freescale.com> wrote:
>> On 04/22/2013 08:43 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>>
>>> This features the following updates:
>>>
>>> * Fixes i.MX51EVK board support
>>> * Update to 2013.04 final release
>>
>>
>> Finally it's the final release.
>>
>> Could you, please, update the commit subject to reflect it's the final
>> release of Uboot? (I mean, instead of being a 'snapshot'. I know everything
>> is a snapshot, but i would like to have a more formal subject)
>
> When I was writting the commit log I pondered about it and I choose to
> not mention it in subject because it is not 2013.04 only but fixes on
> top of it. One of changes merged is the final release.
>
> What you think?
Sincerely I don't know. I got confused because you update u-boot so much
last weeks that I don't know what we have today.
But, when you update to the formal 2013.04 RELEASE (instead of release
candidate), please, make everyone know it on subject/shortlog
--
Daiane
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-22 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-22 11:43 [meta-fsl-arm PATCH 1/6] u-boot-fslc: Update to patches-2013.04's 20130420 snapshot Otavio Salvador
2013-04-22 11:43 ` [meta-fsl-arm PATCH 2/6] linux-fslc: Update to patches-3.8's snapshot from 20130420 Otavio Salvador
2013-04-22 11:57 ` Daiane Angolini
2013-04-22 12:01 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-04-22 12:07 ` Daiane Angolini
2013-04-22 11:43 ` [meta-fsl-arm PATCH 3/6] xserver-xorg: Do not remove Xorg native DRI module Otavio Salvador
2013-04-22 11:43 ` [meta-fsl-arm PATCH 4/6] xf86-dri-vivante: Add rdepends for GLX, DRI and DRI2 Xorg's extensions Otavio Salvador
2013-04-22 11:43 ` [meta-fsl-arm PATCH 5/6] gpu-viv-bin-mx6q: Package DRI module Otavio Salvador
2013-04-22 11:43 ` [meta-fsl-arm PATCH 6/6] xf86-video-imxfb-vivante: Add rdepends on libvivante-dri-mx6 Otavio Salvador
2013-04-22 11:55 ` [meta-fsl-arm PATCH 1/6] u-boot-fslc: Update to patches-2013.04's 20130420 snapshot Daiane Angolini
2013-04-22 12:05 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-04-22 12:21 ` Daiane Angolini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51752B5E.1050204@freescale.com \
--to=daiane.angolini@freescale.com \
--cc=meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org \
--cc=otavio@ossystems.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.