From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: EXYNOS: no more support non-DT for EXYNOS SoCs Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 02:08:40 +0900 Message-ID: <51756E98.9040606@samsung.com> References: <51642dab.e844440a.0ad1.ffffc13f@mx.google.com> <201304101459.07263.arnd@arndb.de> <51656D2D.7060004@samsung.com> <201304101555.27984.arnd@arndb.de> <516571BC.9030909@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.220.42]:63515 "EHLO mail-pa0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753076Ab3DVRIp (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:08:45 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id kl13so24424pab.15 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:08:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <516571BC.9030909@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Kukjin Kim Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Sylwester Nawrocki , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, 'Thomas Abraham' , 'Kyungmin Park' , 'Olof Johansson' On 04/10/13 23:05, Kukjin Kim wrote: > On 04/10/13 22:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Wednesday 10 April 2013, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: >>> Hmm, it turns out we are still actively using some boards based on >>> Exynos4210 EVT0 SoCs. And since it seems unlikely the patches from >>> Tomasz [1] adding basic DT support for those will get merged for >>> 3.10, it would be a bit inconvenient to remove the ATAGS support >>> now, leaving Exynos4210 Rev. 0 not supported at all. >> >> I still have hope to get those included. >> > I agree and I asked Tomasz to re-send universal dt patch. > Hi Arnd and Olof, Is it possible to send one more pull-request for this and something like dt patches for exynos? - Kukjin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 02:08:40 +0900 Subject: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: EXYNOS: no more support non-DT for EXYNOS SoCs In-Reply-To: <516571BC.9030909@samsung.com> References: <51642dab.e844440a.0ad1.ffffc13f@mx.google.com> <201304101459.07263.arnd@arndb.de> <51656D2D.7060004@samsung.com> <201304101555.27984.arnd@arndb.de> <516571BC.9030909@samsung.com> Message-ID: <51756E98.9040606@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 04/10/13 23:05, Kukjin Kim wrote: > On 04/10/13 22:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Wednesday 10 April 2013, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: >>> Hmm, it turns out we are still actively using some boards based on >>> Exynos4210 EVT0 SoCs. And since it seems unlikely the patches from >>> Tomasz [1] adding basic DT support for those will get merged for >>> 3.10, it would be a bit inconvenient to remove the ATAGS support >>> now, leaving Exynos4210 Rev. 0 not supported at all. >> >> I still have hope to get those included. >> > I agree and I asked Tomasz to re-send universal dt patch. > Hi Arnd and Olof, Is it possible to send one more pull-request for this and something like dt patches for exynos? - Kukjin