From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] vhost: handle VHOST_USER_SET_LOG_BASE request Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 17:38:10 +0100 Message-ID: <5175915.33XpI3YTlb@xps13> References: <1449027793-30975-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> <565EF7E9.6080400@redhat.com> <20151202143101.GR2325@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Victor Kaplansky , "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Yuanhan Liu Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E6137A6 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 17:39:20 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmvv187 with SMTP id v187so263840996wmv.1 for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 08:39:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20151202143101.GR2325@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-12-02 22:31, Yuanhan Liu: > Thomas, should I write an ABI deprecation note? Can I make it for > v2.2 release If I make one tomorrow? (Sorry that I'm not awared > of that it would be an ABI break). As Panu suggested, it would be better to reserve some room now in 2.2 which already breaks vhost ABI. Maybe we have a chance to keep the same vhost ABI in 2.3. The 2.2 release will probably be closed in less than 2 weeks.