From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
To: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Ben Guthro <ben@guthro.net>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Question about apic ipi interface
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 12:07:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51765D56.1000906@canonical.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1134 bytes --]
I was looking at some older patch and there is one thing I do not understand.
commit f447d56d36af18c5104ff29dcb1327c0c0ac3634
xen: implement apic ipi interface
Specifically there the implementation of xen_send_IPI_mask_allbutself().
void xen_send_IPI_mask_allbutself(const struct cpumask *mask,
int vector)
{
unsigned cpu;
unsigned int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
if (!(num_online_cpus() > 1))
return;
for_each_cpu_and(cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask) {
if (this_cpu == cpu)
continue;
xen_smp_send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);
}
}
Why is this using xen_smp_send_call_function_single_ipi()? This dumps the
supplied vector and always uses XEN_CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_VECTOR. In contrast the
xen_send_IPI_all() and xen_send_IPI_self() keep the (mapped) vector.
Mildly wondering about whether call function would need special casing (just
because xen_smp_send_call_function_ipi() is special). But I don't have the big
picture there.
Thanks,
Stefan
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 899 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next reply other threads:[~2013-04-23 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-23 10:07 Stefan Bader [this message]
2013-04-23 12:15 ` Question about apic ipi interface Ben Guthro
2013-04-23 12:23 ` Stefan Bader
2013-04-23 12:48 ` Stefan Bader
2013-05-08 16:26 ` Stefan Bader
2013-05-08 17:00 ` Ben Guthro
2013-05-09 8:56 ` Ian Campbell
2013-05-09 14:33 ` Stefan Bader
2013-05-22 19:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-23 9:24 ` Stefan Bader
2013-05-24 14:19 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-28 12:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-28 12:50 ` Stefan Bader
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51765D56.1000906@canonical.com \
--to=stefan.bader@canonical.com \
--cc=ben@guthro.net \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.