From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xavier Roche Subject: Re: aio_fsync() a directory ? Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:54:39 +0200 Message-ID: <51780E4F.4060703@exalead.com> References: <513EEF07.5090901@3ds.com> <20130408212729.ED7592C085@topped-with-meat.com> <5163BA06.30600@exalead.com> <20130411225058.989CB2C07B@topped-with-meat.com> <5167A305.1010506@exalead.com> <5174FFBA.8030301@exalead.com> <20130424024857.GA27108@lst.de> <51776E22.1050502@exalead.com> <20130424063326.GN4068@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20130424163459.838832C07D@topped-with-meat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Al Viro , Xavier Roche , Christoph Hellwig , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Roland McGrath Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20130424163459.838832C07D@topped-with-meat.com> List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 04/24/2013 06:34 PM, Roland McGrath wrote: > Take this up with the POSIX committee. Complaining on implementors' > mailing lists won't have any effect on the future text of standards. Absolutely. I'd like to mention that the austin-group-l mailing-list is opened to anyone wishing to contribute (with proper technical arguments, of course), and AFAICS opened to remarks (this bug was opened following one of my remarks - so you may consider this as my fault :p)