All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lauraa@codeaurora.org (Laura Abbott)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: RFC: Unified DMA allocation algorithms
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:35:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51785024.40305@codeaurora.org> (raw)

Hi all,

I've been looking at a better way to do custom dma allocation algorithms 
in a similar style to Ion heaps. Most drivers/clients have come up with 
a series of semi-standard ways to get memory (CMA, memblock_reserve, 
discontiguous pages etc.) . As these allocation schemes get more and 
more complex, there needs to be a since place where all clients (Ion 
based driver vs. DRM driver vs. ???)  can independently take advantage 
of any optimizations and call a single API for the backing allocations.

The dma_map_ops take care of almost everything needed for abstraction
but the question is where should new allocation algorithms be located?
Most of the work has been added to either arm/mm/dma-mapping.c or
dma-contiguous.c . My current thought:

1) split out the dma_map_ops currently in dma-mapping.c into separate 
files (dma-mapping-common.c, dma-mapping-iommu.c)
2) Extend dma-contiguous.c to support memblock_reserve memory
3) Place additional algorithms in either arch/arm/mm or 
drivers/base/dma-alloc/ as appropriate to the code. This is the part 
where I'm most unsure about the direction.

I don't have anything written yet but I plan to draft some patches 
assuming the proposed approach sounds reasonable and no one else has 
started on something similar already.

Thoughts? Opinions?

Thanks,
Laura

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

             reply	other threads:[~2013-04-24 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-24 21:35 Laura Abbott [this message]
2013-05-01 10:26 ` [Linaro-mm-sig] RFC: Unified DMA allocation algorithms Daniel Vetter
2013-05-01 10:26   ` Daniel Vetter
2013-05-01 15:24 ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51785024.40305@codeaurora.org \
    --to=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.