From: lauraa@codeaurora.org (Laura Abbott)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: RFC: Unified DMA allocation algorithms
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:35:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51785024.40305@codeaurora.org> (raw)
Hi all,
I've been looking at a better way to do custom dma allocation algorithms
in a similar style to Ion heaps. Most drivers/clients have come up with
a series of semi-standard ways to get memory (CMA, memblock_reserve,
discontiguous pages etc.) . As these allocation schemes get more and
more complex, there needs to be a since place where all clients (Ion
based driver vs. DRM driver vs. ???) can independently take advantage
of any optimizations and call a single API for the backing allocations.
The dma_map_ops take care of almost everything needed for abstraction
but the question is where should new allocation algorithms be located?
Most of the work has been added to either arm/mm/dma-mapping.c or
dma-contiguous.c . My current thought:
1) split out the dma_map_ops currently in dma-mapping.c into separate
files (dma-mapping-common.c, dma-mapping-iommu.c)
2) Extend dma-contiguous.c to support memblock_reserve memory
3) Place additional algorithms in either arch/arm/mm or
drivers/base/dma-alloc/ as appropriate to the code. This is the part
where I'm most unsure about the direction.
I don't have anything written yet but I plan to draft some patches
assuming the proposed approach sounds reasonable and no one else has
started on something similar already.
Thoughts? Opinions?
Thanks,
Laura
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next reply other threads:[~2013-04-24 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-24 21:35 Laura Abbott [this message]
2013-05-01 10:26 ` [Linaro-mm-sig] RFC: Unified DMA allocation algorithms Daniel Vetter
2013-05-01 10:26 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-05-01 15:24 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51785024.40305@codeaurora.org \
--to=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.