From: Liu Yuan <namei.unix@gmail.com>
To: sheepdog@lists.wpkg.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
MORITA Kazutaka <morita.kazutaka@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] sheepdog: fix loadvm operation
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:12:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5178AD4A.6050306@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366822079-6582-1-git-send-email-namei.unix@gmail.com>
On 04/25/2013 12:47 AM, Liu Yuan wrote:
> - don't break old behavior if we boot up on the snapshot by using s->reverted
> to indicate if we delete working VDI successfully
If we implement 'boot from snapshot' == loadvm snapshot, we don't need
s->reverted. What do you think, Kazutaka? With this idea, qemu -hda
sheepdog:test:id will be virtually the same as qemu -hda sheepdog:test
-loadvm id.
I don't understand the usecase for snapshting current workding VDI and
then restore to the specified snapshot.
Thanks,
Yuan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-25 4:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-24 16:47 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] sheepdog: fix loadvm operation Liu Yuan
2013-04-25 4:12 ` Liu Yuan [this message]
2013-04-25 8:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [sheepdog] " MORITA Kazutaka
2013-04-25 8:27 ` Liu Yuan
2013-04-25 8:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] " Liu Yuan
2013-04-25 9:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [sheepdog] " MORITA Kazutaka
2013-04-25 9:44 ` Liu Yuan
2013-04-25 10:03 ` MORITA Kazutaka
2013-04-25 12:32 ` Liu Yuan
2013-04-25 12:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] " Liu Yuan
2013-04-25 13:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [sheepdog] " MORITA Kazutaka
2013-04-26 9:04 ` Liu Yuan
2013-04-26 11:39 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-04-26 11:48 ` Liu Yuan
2013-04-26 11:41 ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5178AD4A.6050306@gmail.com \
--to=namei.unix@gmail.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=morita.kazutaka@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sheepdog@lists.wpkg.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.