Re: [PATCH 2/4] net/cpsw: make sure modules remove does not leak any ressources

[Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com>]

On 4/25/2013 12:18 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> This driver does not clean up properly after leaving. Here is a list:
> - Use unregister_netdev(). free_netdev() is good but not enough
> - Use the above also on the other ndev in case of dual mac
> - Free data.slave_data. The name of the strucre makes it look like
>    it is platform_data but it is not. It is just a trick!
> - Free all irqs. Again: freeing one irq is good start, but freeing all
>    of them is better.
>
> With this rmmod & modprobe of cpsw seems to work. The remaining issue
> is:
> |WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:536 sysfs_add_one+0x9c/0xd4()
> |sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/ocp.2/4a100000.ethernet/4a101000.mdio'
> |WARNING: at lib/kobject.c:196 kobject_add_internal+0x1a4/0x1c8()
>
> comming from of_platform_populate() and I am not sure that this belongs
> here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c |   23 ++++++++++++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> index f91c8ab..1983f23 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> @@ -1636,7 +1636,7 @@ static int cpsw_probe_dual_emac(struct platform_device *pdev,
>   
>   static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   {
> -	struct cpsw_platform_data	*data = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> +	struct cpsw_platform_data	*data;
>   	struct net_device		*ndev;
>   	struct cpsw_priv		*priv;
>   	struct cpdma_params		dma_params;
> @@ -1849,7 +1849,7 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   				goto clean_ale_ret;
>   			}
>   			priv->irqs_table[k] = i;
> -			priv->num_irqs = k;
> +			priv->num_irqs = k + 1;
>   		}
>   		k++;
>   	}
> @@ -1887,7 +1887,8 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	return 0;
>   
>   clean_irq_ret:
> -	free_irq(ndev->irq, priv);
> +	for (i = 0; i < priv->num_irqs; i++)
> +		free_irq(priv->irqs_table[i], priv);
>   clean_ale_ret:
>   	cpsw_ale_destroy(priv->ale);
>   clean_dma_ret:
> @@ -1910,7 +1911,8 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>   	kfree(priv->slaves);
>   clean_ndev_ret:
> -	free_netdev(ndev);
> +	kfree(priv->data.slave_data);
> +	free_netdev(priv->ndev);
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
> @@ -1918,12 +1920,17 @@ static int cpsw_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   {
>   	struct net_device *ndev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>   	struct cpsw_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> +	int i;
>   
> -	pr_info("removing device");
>   	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
> +	if (priv->data.dual_emac)
> +		unregister_netdev(cpsw_get_slave_ndev(priv, 1));
> +	unregister_netdev(ndev);
>   
>   	cpts_unregister(priv->cpts);
> -	free_irq(ndev->irq, priv);
> +	for (i = 0; i < priv->num_irqs; i++)
> +		free_irq(priv->irqs_table[i], priv);
> +
>   	cpsw_ale_destroy(priv->ale);
>   	cpdma_chan_destroy(priv->txch);
>   	cpdma_chan_destroy(priv->rxch);
> @@ -1937,8 +1944,10 @@ static int cpsw_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>   	clk_put(priv->clk);
>   	kfree(priv->slaves);
> +	kfree(priv->data.slave_data);
> +	if (priv->data.dual_emac)
> +		free_netdev(cpsw_get_slave_ndev(priv, 1));
>   	free_netdev(ndev);
> -
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
Acked-by: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com>

Regards
Mugunthan V N