From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: brady Subject: Vanity Hostnames Not Working Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:29:52 -0700 Message-ID: <5179AE60.2090700@lamphost.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from tux1.lamphost.net ([69.43.195.66]:46765 "EHLO tux1.lamphost.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759031Ab3DYWst (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:48:49 -0400 Received: from rrcs-64-183-4-86.west.biz.rr.com ([64.183.4.86]:55887 helo=[192.168.1.17]) by tux1.lamphost.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UVUfp-0006I4-5I for ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:29:53 -0700 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Hello list, We are running Bobtail on our cluster and currently attempting to make the vanity host names work in the radosGW configuration. Our rgw segment of the ceph.conf file looks like: [client.radosgw.rgw1] host = ceph-rgw1 rgw dns name = objects.lamphost.net rgw resolve cname = true rgw enable usage log = true keyring = /etc/ceph/keyring.radosgw.rgw1 rgw socket path = /run/radosgw.sock log file = /var/log/ceph/radosgw.log The DNS does not seem to route with the configuration above. Is there something else/different that is required to make this work? We have not seen any concrete examples of configurations for this despite the Vanity host names being listed as an addition in the Bobtail release notes. Thanks in advance! -Brady