From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <517A2BCF.6020609@xenomai.org> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:25:03 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <00f801ce3fcb$30850ce0$918f26a0$@com> <51763D6E.6090407@xenomai.org> <016901ce4043$7b54e1f0$71fea5d0$@com> <5176D40E.7060607@xenomai.org> <019a01ce40a5$95325b90$bf9712b0$@com> <51777F8C.9000700@xenomai.org> <51778229.1050109@xenomai.org> <01c601ce4249$27a8e8f0$76fabad0$@com> In-Reply-To: <01c601ce4249$27a8e8f0$76fabad0$@com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] for-core-3.8 on ARM ( i.MX53 ) List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: George Pontis Cc: Xenomai On 04/26/2013 08:42 AM, George Pontis wrote: > Hello Gilles, > > I was experimenting with this and found that the problem is some kind > of interaction between my other patches, and the 3.8 ipipe patch. The > other patches were to add i.MX53 support for LCD, framebuffer, and > IPU ( image processing unit ). Those patches are newer versions of > the ones in staging from Sascha Hauer. Eventually I do need to get it > all playing together. > > So as far as Xenomai-current, I am seeing it build and boot on > i.MX53, but have not done any more testing yet. I thought that I > tried the exact kernel that you had on git without success. Possibly > the kernel config file in my buildroot has some different IPIPE > options. This is what I have in the working .config: Hi Georges, I am currently testing Xenomai on imx53, there were a few missing pieces, but it seems to be running now, I am running the "xeno-regression-test" test. Please make the patches you are talking about available, I will test them. > CONFIG_IPIPE=y CONFIG_IPIPE_LEGACY=y > <--- is this needed ? Yes. Regards. -- Gilles.