Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] vfio: Move container list to DMAContext

[Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>]

Il 26/04/2013 10:56, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
> On 04/26/2013 06:52 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 26/04/2013 10:46, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>>> On 04/26/2013 06:44 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>> Il 25/04/2013 08:36, David Gibson ha scritto:
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 06:33:33PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>>> Il 24/04/2013 17:12, Alex Williamson ha scritto:
>>>>>>>>> At the moment, vfio maintains a global list of containers
>>>>>>>>> that are assumed to be more or less interchangeable, since
>>>>>>>>> they are all set up with a MemoryListener to have all of
>>>>>>>>> system memory mapped.  However, that only makes sense if
>>>>>>>>> all the containers are used on devices which really do
>>>>>>>>> expect a dma address space identical to system memory.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This patch moves towards that by making the list of
>>>>>>>>> containers per DMAContext (which corresponds to a dma
>>>>>>>>> address space) instead of global.
>>>>>>> This seems like an unnecessary intrusion into common code.  Why
>>>>>>> not create a vfio specific list of dma objects, each with a
>>>>>>> list of containers?  Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, I suggest that this is re-evaluated on top of the iommu
>>>>>> patches.
>>>>>
>>>>>> You can find them at git://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git, branch
>>>>>> iommu. It seems to work with pseries, at least my guest crashes
>>>>>> at the same place with and without.  USB works, and so do VGA and
>>>>>> spapr-vscsi.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, I'll have a look when I get a chance.  Any guesses as to when
>>>>> they might reach mainline?
>>>>
>>>> If I get your Tested-by, early in 1.6.
>>>
>>> Emulated PCI works on ppc64/spapr so far.
>>
>> What about VIO?  Doesn't it go through the IOMMU as well?  I'm sure you
>> can test it more than I did (it did break in Avi's original patches, so
>> it must not be that bad...).
> 
> I run QEMU with
> -net nic,model=ibmveth -net user,hostfwd=tcp::5000-:22
> and run in the guest: "dhclient ; wget google.com" which worked fine.
> When it damaged, it does not go further than dhclient :)

Ok, that counts as a Tested-by from you, I guess.

Paolo