Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 26

[Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>]

On 26.4.2013 13:45, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> wrote:
>>> On 26.4.2013 13:08, Michal Marek wrote:
>>>> On 26.4.2013 12:49, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>>>> With reverting all kbuild-next commits I was able to build again.
>>>>>
>>>>>       Revert "kconfig: implement KCONFIG_PROBABILITY for randconfig"
>>>>>       Revert "kconfig: allow specifying the seed for randconfig"
>>>>>       Revert "kconfig: fix randomising choice entries in presence of
>>>>> KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG"
>>>>>       Revert "kconfig: do not override symbols already set"
>>>>>       Revert "kconfig: fix randconfig tristate detection"
>>>>
>>>> I did the same, then applied all the kconfig commits once more and did a
>>>> git bisect with this script:
>>>>
>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>
>>>> cp config-bad .config
>>>> make silentoldconfig </dev/null
>>>>
>>>> This resulted in
>>>>
>>>> 7ded2624f8988bd22819a60a6000ba6b7091db89 is the first bad commit
>>>> commit 7ded2624f8988bd22819a60a6000ba6b7091db89
>>>> Author: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
>>>> Date:   Sun Mar 10 16:34:10 2013 +0100
>>>>
>>>>     kconfig: fix randomising choice entries in presence of KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG
>>>>
>>>> The commit id is different, because it is reverted and applied again. Yann?
>>>
>>> Commit 422c809 ("kconfig: fix randomising choice entries in presence of
>>> KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG") reverts cleanly and reverting it fixes the bug. So
>>> there is a plan B.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for your efforts!
>>
> 
> Feel free to add my...
> 
>      Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>

Well, I hope that Yann will come up with a proper fix. He is usually
online during evening hours (+0200), so let's wait some time. Of course,
the fallback is to apply the revert and then I will add your Tested-by.

Michal