From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38096) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UWOt3-00023u-QE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 06:31:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UWOt2-0007br-32 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 06:31:17 -0400 Message-ID: <517CFA5F.9040508@web.de> Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 12:30:55 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1367109168-3673-1-git-send-email-andreas.faerber@web.de> <7F54D756-8594-4181-A2FC-75E0DA568770@suse.de> <517CF710.3000900@web.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH prep for-1.5] prep: Add ELF support for -bios List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, chouteau@adacore.com, PReP , Paolo Bonzini , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Herv=E9_Poussineau?= Am 28.04.2013 12:22, schrieb Alexander Graf: > > On 28.04.2013, at 12:16, Andreas Färber wrote: > >> P.S. I am happy about your review comments, but you were not >> intentionally CC'ed on a PReP patch - this is apparently the result of >> Paolo having used hw/ppc/ pattern in the ppc TCG guest core section, >> which used to be target-ppc/ only. Should we exclude prep.c and future >> PReP files or even hw/ppc/ from that MAINTAINERS section? Similar > > I think having hw/ppc at least listed as CC to qemu-ppc@nongnu.org is a good idea. I'm not sure how much hassle it'll be to split maintainership inside of a directory. Does it mean we have to list all files individually? That'd be annoying :). Well, what I was rather thinking of was removing F: hw/foo/ from all "Guest CPU cores (TCG)" sections. We already have boards listed individually under "PowerPC Machines", so this seems duplicate here; alternatively it would certainly be possible to add a new heading for hw/foo/ entries. I do not remember seeing any discussion about this MAINTAINERS change nor us ack'ing it, so reverting would seem the most natural solution. Exclusion in the current scheme would mean adding: X: hw/ppc/prep.c Andreas