All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
To: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] seccomp filter JIT
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:18:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <517E6505.6030005@freebox.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKU6vybdnpoM-szTrJRDVM2sqNPvAe3Tszg+tCuziKSOEXjJ1w@mail.gmail.com>

On 04/26/2013 02:31 PM, Xi Wang wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer.
>
> For the ARM part, looks like Nicolas's patch requires to implement two
> wrappers for each arch:
>
>    void seccomp_jit_compile(struct seccomp_filter *fp);
>    void seccomp_jit_free(struct seccomp_filter *fp);
>
> The implementation of these wrappers is almost identical to:
>
>    void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp);
>    void bpf_jit_free(struct sk_filter *fp);
>
> While this patch uses a unified interface for both packet & seccomp filters.
>
>    bpf_func_t bpf_jit_compile(struct sock_filter *filter, unsigned int flen);
>    void bpf_jit_free(bpf_func_t bpf_func);
>
> Shouldn't be hard to merge though.

Hi,

I went for the solution I submitted because I wanted to avoid changes to the 
current bpf_jit_compile prototypes for all currently supported architectures 
(for most of which, I can only compile-test).

My solution also allows the seccomp jit code to be disabled while still 
allowing jit on socket filters (via a Kconfig option). This might be useful to 
some people.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Schichan
Freebox SAS

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-04-29 12:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-26  7:51 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] seccomp filter JIT Xi Wang
2013-04-26  7:51 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/6] filter: refactor BPF JIT for seccomp filters Xi Wang
2013-04-26 15:20   ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-26  7:51 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/6] x86: bpf_jit_comp: support BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W instruction Xi Wang
2013-04-26 14:18   ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-26 14:50     ` Xi Wang
2013-04-26 15:11       ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-26 15:29         ` Xi Wang
2013-04-26 15:43           ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-26 15:57             ` Xi Wang
2013-04-26 18:48             ` David Miller
2013-04-26 16:02         ` Xi Wang
2013-04-26 16:14           ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-26 18:25             ` Xi Wang
2013-04-26 18:40               ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-26 15:15       ` David Laight
2013-04-26 15:27         ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-26 15:38           ` David Laight
2013-04-26 15:38             ` David Laight
2013-04-26 15:46             ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-26  7:51 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/6] ARM: net: bpf_jit_32: " Xi Wang
2013-04-26  7:51 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 4/6] PPC: net: bpf_jit_comp: refactor the BPF JIT interface Xi Wang
2013-04-26  7:51 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 5/6] sparc: " Xi Wang
2013-04-26  7:51 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 6/6] s390/bpf,jit: " Xi Wang
2013-04-26 11:25 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] seccomp filter JIT Heiko Carstens
2013-04-26 11:46   ` Heiko Carstens
2013-04-26 12:15     ` Xi Wang
2013-04-26 11:46   ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-26 12:31     ` Xi Wang
2013-04-26 12:38       ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-29 12:18       ` Nicolas Schichan [this message]
2013-04-29 13:21         ` Nicolas Schichan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=517E6505.6030005@freebox.fr \
    --to=nschichan@freebox.fr \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mgherzan@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    --cc=xi.wang@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.