From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 29 Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:05:58 -0700 Message-ID: <517ED2A6.5030200@infradead.org> References: <20130429191754.8ee71fb814790bf345516ab8@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130429191754.8ee71fb814790bf345516ab8@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux MM List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On 04/29/13 02:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130426: > (who is responsible for MEM_SOFT_DIRTY?) on x86_64: warning: (HWPOISON_INJECT && MEM_SOFT_DIRTY) selects PROC_PAGE_MONITOR which has unmet direct dependencies (PROC_FS && MMU) because MEM_SOFT_DIRTY selects PROC_PAGE_MONITOR when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled. Can MEM_SOFT_DIRTY depend on PROC_FS? and the help text for MEM_SOFT_DIRTY refers to Documentation/vm/soft-dirty.txt, which does not exist. Please add the file. -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759311Ab3D2UGa (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:06:30 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:58309 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758333Ab3D2UG3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:06:29 -0400 Message-ID: <517ED2A6.5030200@infradead.org> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:05:58 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Rothwell CC: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux MM Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 29 References: <20130429191754.8ee71fb814790bf345516ab8@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20130429191754.8ee71fb814790bf345516ab8@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/29/13 02:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130426: > (who is responsible for MEM_SOFT_DIRTY?) on x86_64: warning: (HWPOISON_INJECT && MEM_SOFT_DIRTY) selects PROC_PAGE_MONITOR which has unmet direct dependencies (PROC_FS && MMU) because MEM_SOFT_DIRTY selects PROC_PAGE_MONITOR when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled. Can MEM_SOFT_DIRTY depend on PROC_FS? and the help text for MEM_SOFT_DIRTY refers to Documentation/vm/soft-dirty.txt, which does not exist. Please add the file. -- ~Randy