Re: Xen 4.3 related documents - these need review and improvement in the coming weeks

[Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xen.org>]

On 30/04/2013 08:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
> I fixed what was obvious, but I wonder where the OVMF/Tianocore
> line originates from: This was disabled in 4.2 (as it didn't build except
> with one specific gcc version iirc), and I didn't see its state change
> in -unstable. And in any event - afaict - this is at best experimental.
>
> Jan
Thank you Jan. Looking at the logs this line came from Ian Campbell 
(added this to 4.2 on Sept 10 2012).
I am happy to mark this as disabled (footnote [4]) and/or experimental. 
Any views?

On 30/04/2013 09:02, Dietmar Hahn wrote:
> The description for vPMU is stated with "Virtual Power Management Unit 
> for HVM guests". On xen-devel vPMU is normally meant to be "Virtual 
> Performance Monitoring Unit"
> So what is meant here?
> Dietmar. 
That is a good question. Again, looking at the logs, Ian Campbell added 
these in the same batch as the item above. Probably just a typo. Please 
somebody make a call and advise. I guess if it is Virtual Performance 
Monitoring Unit, this line should probably also go into the "Tooling" header

Thanks for the review so far and spotting issues

Lars