From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@xen.org>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86/HVM: RTC/VPT adjustments
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 17:15:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51813FBF.5010105@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <517E94E602000078000D1AE7@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 29/04/13 14:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
> 1: fix processing of RTC REG_B writes
> 2: slightly adjust RTC reset
> 3: adjust IRQ (de-)assertion
> 4: properly handle RTC periodic timer even when !RTC_PIE
> 5: fix legacy PIC check in pt_update_irq()
> 6: RTC code must be in line with WAET flags passed by hvmloader
>
> This fixes the Win2003 boot failure George reported. Roger, since
> the first patch is slightly different from what you tested earlier,
> could you re-test that patch alone and the full series against
> FreeBSD?
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
This series seems to fix the w2k3 issue -- but it looks like a series of
"fixes and updates". I thought we had decided to revert all the RTC
changes?
-George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-01 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-29 13:42 [PATCH 0/6] x86/HVM: RTC/VPT adjustments Jan Beulich
2013-04-29 13:51 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/HVM: fix processing of RTC REG_B writes Jan Beulich
2013-05-02 8:07 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-05-02 9:21 ` Tim Deegan
2013-05-02 9:40 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-02 9:48 ` Tim Deegan
2013-04-29 13:52 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86/HVM: slightly adjust RTC reset Jan Beulich
2013-05-02 9:27 ` Tim Deegan
2013-05-02 9:51 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-02 10:05 ` Tim Deegan
2013-04-29 13:53 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86/HVM: adjust IRQ (de-)assertion Jan Beulich
2013-05-02 9:34 ` Tim Deegan
2013-05-02 9:54 ` Jan Beulich
2013-04-29 13:53 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86/HVM: properly handle RTC periodic timer even when !RTC_PIE Jan Beulich
2013-05-02 9:41 ` Tim Deegan
2013-05-02 10:02 ` Jan Beulich
2013-04-29 13:54 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86/HVM: fix legacy PIC check in pt_update_irq() Jan Beulich
2013-05-02 9:46 ` Tim Deegan
2013-04-29 13:56 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86/HVM: RTC code must be in line with WAET flags passed by hvmloader Jan Beulich
2013-05-01 16:15 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2013-05-02 6:58 ` [PATCH 0/6] x86/HVM: RTC/VPT adjustments Jan Beulich
2013-05-02 9:23 ` George Dunlap
2013-05-02 9:53 ` Tim Deegan
2013-05-02 10:03 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-02 8:15 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-05-02 8:50 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51813FBF.5010105@eu.citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.