From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gerlando Falauto Subject: Re: [PATCH v3b 1/3] tipc: cosmetic: clean up comments and break a long line Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 19:56:30 +0200 Message-ID: <5181574E.8060909@keymile.com> References: <1367426477-10441-1-git-send-email-gerlando.falauto@keymile.com> <20130501.131602.899596493606702378.davem@davemloft.net> <5181524D.6000207@keymile.com> <20130501.134356.491039302692790983.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com" , "jon.maloy@ericsson.com" , "erik.hugne@ericsson.com" , "ying.xue@windriver.com" , "Brunck, Holger" To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail.ch.keymile.com ([193.17.201.103]:45465 "HELO mail-ch.keymile.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752025Ab3EAR4i (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 May 2013 13:56:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130501.134356.491039302692790983.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, On 05/01/2013 07:43 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Gerlando Falauto > Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 19:35:09 +0200 > >> That I don't understand. I thought it would be the other way around, >> that's why I resubmitted only the one which changed. > > Any patch you submit I assume you test applied yourself successfully, > therefore by submitting it you are saying that you validated them > as a series explicitly or know that the other patches have no conflicts. I understand, you're right. I hope adding "Changes from v(n-1): None" should also be enough to say that further review should not be necessary as the patch is identical to the previous version. > Also, please never submit new versions of patches in replies to older > patch discussions. > > Chain replies in order to construct a series are OK, especially when > you provide a proper "[PATCH 0/N] ..." initial posting explaining > the series. > OK, thanks. Gerlando