From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53330)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <chouteau@adacore.com>) id 1UXoo6-00072r-Po
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 04:24:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <chouteau@adacore.com>) id 1UXoo5-0008Mq-I7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 04:24:02 -0400
Message-ID: <51822295.7000908@adacore.com>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 10:23:49 +0200
From: Fabien Chouteau <chouteau@adacore.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <517D2B5B.1020806@web.de>
	<1367334424-10656-1-git-send-email-chouteau@adacore.com>
	<517FE217.5000105@suse.de> <517FEA86.3040507@adacore.com>
	<517FEC00.7070506@suse.de> <517FF00A.5040207@adacore.com>
	<517FF31E.3000002@suse.de> <518021A2.1090401@reactos.org>
In-Reply-To: <518021A2.1090401@reactos.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix PReP NIP reset value
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Herv=E9_Poussineau?= <hpoussin@reactos.org>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, blauwirbel@gmail.com, andreas.faerber@web.de, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, anthony@codemonkey.ws, aurelien@aurel32.net

On 04/30/2013 09:55 PM, Herv=E9 Poussineau wrote:
> Alexander Graf a =E9crit :
>> On 04/30/2013 06:23 PM, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
>>> On 04/30/2013 06:06 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>> On 04/30/2013 06:00 PM, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
>>>>> On 04/30/2013 05:24 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>> Maybe OHW is also just wrong ;).
>>>>
>>> Maybe, but I have no way to prove it.
>>
>> Ok, let's leave it at that patch then ;). It'd be good to know if herv=
e can boot his real images from 0x100. If so, OHW is likely at fault and =
we can revert the change once Andreas switched to OpenBIOS.
>=20
> My real image only booted with a 601 and 604 which had a reset vector o=
f 0x00000100. With the committed change, 602 and 603 also work.
> So I think that the change is correct, and that OpenHackWare incorrectl=
y assumes a reset vector of 0xfffffffc...
>=20

Thanks, so Alexander is right we should revert this patch when we
switch to OpenBios.


--=20
Fabien Chouteau