Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Drop redundant resume_all_vcpus from main

["Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>]

Am 02.05.2013 13:20, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
> On 2012-08-21 09:01, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 20/08/2012 20:11, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
>>> VCPUs are either resumed directly via vm_start, after the incoming
>>> migration is done, or when a continue command is issued. We don't need
>>> the explicit resume before entering main_loop.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> I was adding nesting support to pause/resume_all_vcpus, and that
>>> stumbled over the imbalance below.
>>>
>>>  vl.c |    1 -
>>>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c
>>> index ebee867..231d3ab 100644
>>> --- a/vl.c
>>> +++ b/vl.c
>>> @@ -3757,7 +3757,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
>>>  
>>>      os_setup_post();
>>>  
>>> -    resume_all_vcpus();
>>>      main_loop();
>>>      bdrv_close_all();
>>>      pause_all_vcpus();
>>>
>>
>> Makes sense.  Do we need a "main loop and similar" tree, or can that
>> tree be just uq/master now that qemu-kvm.c is dying?
> 
> Just noticed that this cleanup didn't make it into upstream back then.
> Not truly trivial, but also not really risky.

Since I happened to touch that CPU function just yesterday and Paolo and
me seem to agree the call is superfluous, applying it to qom-cpu:

https://github.com/afaerber/qemu-cpu/commits/qom-cpu

Thanks,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg