All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v10 0/2] (arm-soc for v3.10) arm: introduce psci_smp_ops
Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 20:51:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5183182F.1050408@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMgtwb5z-LcJNf7Jtnz92T7u3Z9_uzBxYCaD1ahwYa514A@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/02/2013 03:34 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> On Thursday 02 May 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> The only issue that there is is where we are in the development cycle
>>> (almost mid merge window), and I've yet to push anything to Linus thanks
>>> to late discovery of various messups in other chunks of code submitted
>>> via my tree - I'm starting to drop stuff from my tree in the hope that
>>> I'll get back to something that's going to be suitable for mainline.
>>>
>>> I really don't want to go pulling anything else at the moment in the
>>> hope of getting what I currently have out the door.
>>>
>>> And in any case, we shouldn't be adding any new code to our trees at
>>> this point in time.
>>
>> Agreed. I would have like to see the patches in 3.10, but the timing
>> didn't work out.
>>
>> Stefano, I'm sure we can queue it up early for 3.11 if you send them
>> again after the merge window. Sorry you had to go through 10 versions
>> and not getting it merged in time in the end.
> 
> Yeah, sorry for being quiet on this; I've seen the patches go by but
> also haven't looked closely at them since timing was pointing more
> towards 3.11 material. 3.10 is already a very busy release for us on
> arm-soc.
> 
> If there's SoC code that needs this as a base, we can do a shared
> branch with Russell. That has worked well in the past -- he merges it
> but we bring in a copy of the topic in our tree.

Yes, there will be. I've got highbank about ready to go.

Rob

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/2] (arm-soc for v3.10) arm: introduce psci_smp_ops
Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 20:51:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5183182F.1050408@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMgtwb5z-LcJNf7Jtnz92T7u3Z9_uzBxYCaD1ahwYa514A@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/02/2013 03:34 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> On Thursday 02 May 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> The only issue that there is is where we are in the development cycle
>>> (almost mid merge window), and I've yet to push anything to Linus thanks
>>> to late discovery of various messups in other chunks of code submitted
>>> via my tree - I'm starting to drop stuff from my tree in the hope that
>>> I'll get back to something that's going to be suitable for mainline.
>>>
>>> I really don't want to go pulling anything else at the moment in the
>>> hope of getting what I currently have out the door.
>>>
>>> And in any case, we shouldn't be adding any new code to our trees at
>>> this point in time.
>>
>> Agreed. I would have like to see the patches in 3.10, but the timing
>> didn't work out.
>>
>> Stefano, I'm sure we can queue it up early for 3.11 if you send them
>> again after the merge window. Sorry you had to go through 10 versions
>> and not getting it merged in time in the end.
> 
> Yeah, sorry for being quiet on this; I've seen the patches go by but
> also haven't looked closely at them since timing was pointing more
> towards 3.11 material. 3.10 is already a very busy release for us on
> arm-soc.
> 
> If there's SoC code that needs this as a base, we can do a shared
> branch with Russell. That has worked well in the past -- he merges it
> but we bring in a copy of the topic in our tree.

Yes, there will be. I've got highbank about ready to go.

Rob


  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-03  1:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-30 16:17 [PATCH v10 0/2] (arm-soc for v3.10) arm: introduce psci_smp_ops Stefano Stabellini
2013-04-30 16:17 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-04-30 16:18 ` [PATCH v10 1/2] " Stefano Stabellini
2013-04-30 16:18   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-04-30 16:18   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-04-30 16:18 ` [PATCH v10 2/2] ARM: Enable selection of SMP operations at boot time Stefano Stabellini
2013-04-30 16:18   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-04-30 16:18   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-02 17:12 ` [PATCH v10 0/2] (arm-soc for v3.10) arm: introduce psci_smp_ops Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-02 17:12   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-02 17:15   ` Will Deacon
2013-05-02 17:15     ` Will Deacon
2013-05-02 17:15     ` Will Deacon
2013-05-02 17:20     ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-02 17:20       ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-02 18:18       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-02 18:18         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-02 18:23         ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-02 18:23           ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-02 18:28       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-02 18:28         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-02 18:42         ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-02 18:42           ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-02 18:48           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-02 18:48             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-02 19:03             ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-02 19:03               ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-02 20:34               ` Olof Johansson
2013-05-02 20:34                 ` Olof Johansson
2013-05-03  1:51                 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2013-05-03  1:51                   ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5183182F.1050408@gmail.com \
    --to=robherring2@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.