From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel De Graaf Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/4] xen/xsm: add hooks for claim Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 12:29:51 -0400 Message-ID: <5183E5FF.7050004@tycho.nsa.gov> References: <1367590156-19177-1-git-send-email-dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov> <1367590156-19177-2-git-send-email-dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov> <20130503154613.GA4249@phenom.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130503154613.GA4249@phenom.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Dan Magenheimer , Keir Fraser , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 05/03/2013 11:46 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 10:09:13AM -0400, Daniel De Graaf wrote: >> Adds XSM hooks for the recently introduced XENMEM_claim_pages and >> XENMEM_get_outstanding_pages operations, and adds FLASK access vectors >> for them. This makes the access control decisions for these operations >> match those in the rest of the hypervisor. > > I am not that familiar with this, but it looks OK. However I am > going to post a patch soon that will eliminate one of the hypercalls > (xenmem_get_outstanding_pages). > > Do you want to wait for this or would it be better if I posted > the patch along with some changes to xsm hooks to delete it and > you can Ack it? Either way would be fine with me. I think re-posting may work better as I just found a typo in patch 4 that will be fixed on repost.