All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <51842836.8090601@superduper.net>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 5b1d760..7b1abae 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ On 05/01/2013 07:34 AM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
 > - It means for me, that real use of STBC can be made only on MIMO hardware.
 > - If 1x1 receiver indicates that it got STBC encoded frame, it dos not
 > meant, it would be able to use redundant data from second stream.
-> - There are fallowing STBC schemes: Alamouti?s
+> - There are fallowing STBC schemes: Alamouti’s
 > STBC for 2 transmit antennas and orthogonal STBC for 3 and 4 transmit
 > antennas.
 >
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ On 05/01/2013 07:34 AM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
 > Since STBC should have minimal 2 stream, but in same time we have 1x1
 > and 2x2 hardware which able to receive and decode STBC stream i assume:
 >      - RX-STBC1 is for compatibility only. No data redundancy.
->      - RX-STBC12 - can be used Alamouti?s schema with 2 streams. Mostly
+>      - RX-STBC12 - can be used Alamouti’s schema with 2 streams. Mostly
 > used method.
 >      - RX-STBC123 - is orthogonal schema and not widely used method.
 > Since last method use wide spectrum to transmit data comparable to SISO
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index ef1be1f..bf0498c 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,8 +1,13 @@
  "ref\0518127ED.9060900@rempel-privat.de\0"
  "From\0Simon Barber <simon@superduper.net>\0"
- "Subject\0[ath9k-devel] Standardisation - adding 2 bit STBC and Ness to MCS\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: Standardisation - adding 2 bit STBC and Ness to MCS\0"
  "Date\0Fri, 03 May 2013 14:12:22 -0700\0"
- "To\0ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org\0"
+ "To\0Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>\0"
+ "Cc\0radiotap@netbsd.org"
+  johannes@sipsolutions.net
+  Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
+  ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org <ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org>
+ " linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "I did post example code as attachments to the suggested-fields page a \n"
@@ -44,7 +49,7 @@
  "> - It means for me, that real use of STBC can be made only on MIMO hardware.\n"
  "> - If 1x1 receiver indicates that it got STBC encoded frame, it dos not\n"
  "> meant, it would be able to use redundant data from second stream.\n"
- "> - There are fallowing STBC schemes: Alamouti?s\n"
+ "> - There are fallowing STBC schemes: Alamouti\342\200\231s\n"
  "> STBC for 2 transmit antennas and orthogonal STBC for 3 and 4 transmit\n"
  "> antennas.\n"
  ">\n"
@@ -52,7 +57,7 @@
  "> Since STBC should have minimal 2 stream, but in same time we have 1x1\n"
  "> and 2x2 hardware which able to receive and decode STBC stream i assume:\n"
  ">      - RX-STBC1 is for compatibility only. No data redundancy.\n"
- ">      - RX-STBC12 - can be used Alamouti?s schema with 2 streams. Mostly\n"
+ ">      - RX-STBC12 - can be used Alamouti\342\200\231s schema with 2 streams. Mostly\n"
  "> used method.\n"
  ">      - RX-STBC123 - is orthogonal schema and not widely used method.\n"
  "> Since last method use wide spectrum to transmit data comparable to SISO\n"
@@ -64,4 +69,4 @@
  "> PS: My assumptions based on \"MIMO Space-Time Block Coding (STBC):\n"
  "> Simulations and Results\""
 
-0ae7c2e565c6d9823b9810ca6659c156ad87271dd7110786fe0c423fd377a593
+345f8897dd118e45c969b08e35772c7e562584c8963e049e294acdb4f8f2b382

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index 5b1d760..7b1abae 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ On 05/01/2013 07:34 AM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
 > - It means for me, that real use of STBC can be made only on MIMO hardware.
 > - If 1x1 receiver indicates that it got STBC encoded frame, it dos not
 > meant, it would be able to use redundant data from second stream.
-> - There are fallowing STBC schemes: Alamouti?s
+> - There are fallowing STBC schemes: Alamouti’s
 > STBC for 2 transmit antennas and orthogonal STBC for 3 and 4 transmit
 > antennas.
 >
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ On 05/01/2013 07:34 AM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
 > Since STBC should have minimal 2 stream, but in same time we have 1x1
 > and 2x2 hardware which able to receive and decode STBC stream i assume:
 >      - RX-STBC1 is for compatibility only. No data redundancy.
->      - RX-STBC12 - can be used Alamouti?s schema with 2 streams. Mostly
+>      - RX-STBC12 - can be used Alamouti’s schema with 2 streams. Mostly
 > used method.
 >      - RX-STBC123 - is orthogonal schema and not widely used method.
 > Since last method use wide spectrum to transmit data comparable to SISO
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index ef1be1f..5555d8f 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -1,8 +1,14 @@
  "ref\0518127ED.9060900@rempel-privat.de\0"
- "From\0Simon Barber <simon@superduper.net>\0"
- "Subject\0[ath9k-devel] Standardisation - adding 2 bit STBC and Ness to MCS\0"
+ "ref\0518127ED.9060900-YEK0n+YFykbzxQdaRaTXBw@public.gmane.org\0"
+ "From\0Simon Barber <simon-vp0mx6+5gkqFX2APIN6yfw@public.gmane.org>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: Standardisation - adding 2 bit STBC and Ness to MCS\0"
  "Date\0Fri, 03 May 2013 14:12:22 -0700\0"
- "To\0ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org\0"
+ "To\0Oleksij Rempel <linux-YEK0n+YFykbzxQdaRaTXBw@public.gmane.org>\0"
+ "Cc\0radiotap-qavaossjCcEdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
+  johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org
+  Adrian Chadd <adrian-h+KGxgPPiopAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
+  ath9k-devel-xDcbHBWguxHbcTqmT+pZeQ@public.gmane.org <ath9k-devel-xDcbHBWguxHbcTqmT+pZeQ@public.gmane.org>
+ " linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "I did post example code as attachments to the suggested-fields page a \n"
@@ -44,7 +50,7 @@
  "> - It means for me, that real use of STBC can be made only on MIMO hardware.\n"
  "> - If 1x1 receiver indicates that it got STBC encoded frame, it dos not\n"
  "> meant, it would be able to use redundant data from second stream.\n"
- "> - There are fallowing STBC schemes: Alamouti?s\n"
+ "> - There are fallowing STBC schemes: Alamouti\342\200\231s\n"
  "> STBC for 2 transmit antennas and orthogonal STBC for 3 and 4 transmit\n"
  "> antennas.\n"
  ">\n"
@@ -52,7 +58,7 @@
  "> Since STBC should have minimal 2 stream, but in same time we have 1x1\n"
  "> and 2x2 hardware which able to receive and decode STBC stream i assume:\n"
  ">      - RX-STBC1 is for compatibility only. No data redundancy.\n"
- ">      - RX-STBC12 - can be used Alamouti?s schema with 2 streams. Mostly\n"
+ ">      - RX-STBC12 - can be used Alamouti\342\200\231s schema with 2 streams. Mostly\n"
  "> used method.\n"
  ">      - RX-STBC123 - is orthogonal schema and not widely used method.\n"
  "> Since last method use wide spectrum to transmit data comparable to SISO\n"
@@ -64,4 +70,4 @@
  "> PS: My assumptions based on \"MIMO Space-Time Block Coding (STBC):\n"
  "> Simulations and Results\""
 
-0ae7c2e565c6d9823b9810ca6659c156ad87271dd7110786fe0c423fd377a593
+8680037c82c9b8b8e9cb5d9c438b0243faaeea2bce01f733a5e64d84a73b5b8f

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.