Re: Erasure encoding as a storage backend

[Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1079 bytes --]



On 05/04/2013 08:27 PM, Noah Watkins wrote:
> 
> On May 4, 2013, at 10:16 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
> 
>> it would be great to get feedback before the ceph summit to address the most prominent issues.
> 
> One thing that has been in the back of my mind is how this proposal is influenced (if at all) by a future that includes declustered per-file raid in CephFS. I realize that may be a distant future, but it seems as though there could be a lot of overlap for the (non-client driven) rebuild/recovery component of such an architecture.

Hi Noah,

I'm not sure what declustered per-file raid is, which means it had no influence on this proposal ;-) Would you be so kind as to educate me ?

Cheers

> -Noah
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good people do nothing.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]