From: Mark Nelson <mark.nelson@inktank.com>
To: "Jens Kristian Søgaard" <jens@mermaidconsulting.dk>
Cc: Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@gmail.com>,
Andreas Friedrich <andreas.friedrich@ts.fujitsu.com>,
Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Request for ceph.conf environment extension
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 09:59:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5187C556.6050406@inktank.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5187BB9F.4020301@mermaidconsulting.dk>
On 05/06/2013 09:18 AM, Jens Kristian Søgaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I'm just supposing, i'm also evaluating the same network topology
>> like you.
>
> I have tested my current setup for a while with just triple-bonded GbE,
> and haven't found the need for more features. I might be wrong ofcourse :-)
>
>> There is a lowcost. 12x 10GbaseT switch from Netgear.
>
> I was looking at the Netgear XS708E which is very low cost compared to
> what the prices were 6 months ago when I looked at it last.
I'm really not up to speed on the capabilities of cheap 10GbE switches.
I'm sure other people will have comments about what features are
worthwhile, etc. Just from a raw performance perspective, you might
want to make sure that the switch can handle lots of randomly
distributed traffic between all of the ports well. I'd expect that it
shouldn't be too terrible, but who knows. I expect most IB switches you
run into should deal with this kind of pattern competently enough for
Ceph workloads to do OK. On the front end portion of the network you'll
always have client<->server communication, so the pattern there will be
less all-to-all than the backend traffic (more 1st half <-> 2nd half).
On really big deployments, static routing becomes a pretty big issue.
Dynamic routing, or at least well optimized routes can make a huge
difference. ORNL has done some work in this area for their Lustre IB
networks and I think LLNL is investigating it as well.
Mark
>
> What I don't know is how those prices compare to IB pricing.
>
>> on cluster network and IB to public network). Do you think will be
>> possible to use all ceph services (RBD, RGW, CephFS, QEMU, ...) via
>> SDP/rsockets ?
>
> I haven't tried SDP/rsocket, so I don't know. From what I have
> experienced in the past, these things doesn't seem to be completely
> "drop in and forget about it" - there's always something that is not
> completely compatible with ordinary TCP/IP sockets.
>
>> On ebay there are many IB switches sold at 1000-1500$ with 24 or 36
>> DDR ports. If used with SDP/rsockets you should archieve more or less
>> 18Gbps
>
> That sounds cheap yes, but I assume that is used equipment?
> I was looking at costs for new equipment.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-06 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-06 9:18 Request for ceph.conf environment extension Andreas Friedrich
2013-05-06 12:36 ` Gandalf Corvotempesta
2013-05-06 13:23 ` Mark Nelson
2013-05-06 13:35 ` Gandalf Corvotempesta
2013-05-06 13:39 ` Mark Nelson
2013-05-06 13:48 ` Jens Kristian Søgaard
2013-05-06 13:49 ` Gandalf Corvotempesta
2013-05-06 13:53 ` Jens Kristian Søgaard
2013-05-06 14:00 ` Gandalf Corvotempesta
2013-05-06 14:03 ` Jens Kristian Søgaard
2013-05-06 14:13 ` Gandalf Corvotempesta
2013-05-06 14:18 ` Jens Kristian Søgaard
2013-05-06 14:59 ` Mark Nelson [this message]
2013-05-06 15:16 ` Jens Kristian Søgaard
2013-05-06 15:40 ` Mark Nelson
2013-05-06 16:51 ` Gandalf Corvotempesta
2013-05-06 16:02 ` Request for ceph.conf environment extension / IB performance Kasper Dieter
2013-05-06 12:46 ` Request for ceph.conf environment extension Wido den Hollander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5187C556.6050406@inktank.com \
--to=mark.nelson@inktank.com \
--cc=andreas.friedrich@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gandalf.corvotempesta@gmail.com \
--cc=jens@mermaidconsulting.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.