All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the  tree
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 20:59:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5187FD86.9000005@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130506135109.9c0b24ea1e22784fb28ae6b9@canb.auug.org.au>

Hi,

On 05/06/2013 05:51 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in ipc/sem.c
> between commit 321310ced2d6 ("ipc: move sem_obtain_lock() rcu locking
> into the only caller") from Linus' tree and commit "ipc/sem.c:
> alternatives to preempt_disable()" from the akpm tree.
I would propose that 'ipc/sem.c: alternatives to preempt_disable()' is 
dropped.

As explained in the commit:
That patch is for CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT, it should go into their tree.

--
     Manfred

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-06 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-06  3:51 linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-06 18:59 ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-09-24 13:45 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-24 13:29 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-31  3:50 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-10  8:41 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-27  6:59 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-27 12:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-27 16:52 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-09-27 23:03   ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5187FD86.9000005@colorfullife.com \
    --to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.