From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Bin Gao <bin.gao@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86/pci/mrst: force all pci config toward 0:0:0, 0:2:0 and 0:3:0 to type 1
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 12:02:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5187FE55.8080601@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo66x7eHOy3nqH5kgKjOd-176zgNs3EGpJxYrk1dcKPQPg@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/06/2013 10:38 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Bin Gao <bin.gao@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 11:17:10AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> Is there any possibility of multi-function devices at bus 0, device 0, 2, or 3?
>>>
>>> What about bridges -- can any of these be a bridge?
>>>
>>> If either of those could happen, these checks could be too specific.
>> 0:2:0 and 0:3:0 are the only 2 devices behind the bridge 0:0:0.
>
> Please use the conventional Linux PCI address formatting
> (DDDD:BB:dd.f, where DDDD = domain (optional, often omitted if DDDD ==
> 0), BB = bus, dd = device, f = function), because this is quite
> confusing.
>
> You say "0:2:0 and 0:3:0" are behind the bridge "0:0:0", but the patch
> you sent clearly applies only to devices on bus 0. The patch applies
> to devices 00:00.0, 00:02.0, and 00:03.0. These are all on the same
> bus, so none of them can be behind a bridge.
>
> If the 00:00.0 device is in fact a bridge, its secondary bus will be
> something other than 0, so any devices behind the bridge will be on a
> non-zero bus number. And I assume you would want to use config
> mechanism #1 to reach those devices, too. Your current patch doesn't
> do that -- it only applies to devices on bus 0.
>
0000:00:00.0 is presumably the *host bridge*, which is unique in PCI
space in that it is a type 0 header and sits on what normally would be
the client bus.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-06 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-30 7:21 x86/pci/mrst: force all pci config toward 0:0:0, 0:2:0 and 0:3:0 to type 1 Bin Gao
2013-04-30 17:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-04-30 19:14 ` Bin Gao
2013-05-01 17:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-05-02 6:53 ` Bin Gao
2013-05-06 17:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-05-06 18:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-05-06 22:42 ` Bin Gao
2013-05-06 22:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-05-06 19:02 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-05-06 22:20 ` Bin Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5187FE55.8080601@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bin.gao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.