From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Fehlig Subject: Re: Xend FD leak upon migrate receive Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 09:31:19 -0600 Message-ID: <51891E47.1020606@suse.com> References: <1367494931.21869.105.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1168699139.20130502153655@eikelenboom.it> <1367502124.21869.117.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Steve Prochniak Cc: Sander Eikelenboom , Ian Campbell , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Steve Prochniak wrote: > Fyi - the leak occurs on the receiver side and only exists when using SSL migration. I don't know if that rings any bells or not. > Maybe op_quit() in tools/python/xen/xend/server/relocate.py needs to handle cleaning up the pipe created in op_sslreceive()? Regards, Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Campbell [mailto:Ian.Campbell@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 9:42 AM > To: Sander Eikelenboom > Cc: Steve Prochniak; xen-devel@lists.xen.org > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xend FD leak upon migrate receive > > On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 14:36 +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > >> Thursday, May 2, 2013, 1:42:11 PM, you wrote: >> >> >>> On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 17:50 +0100, Steve Prochniak wrote: >>> >>>> Xend leaks one fd each time a guest migrates to it's server. I'm >>>> wondering if this is a known problem with a known fix, or if someone >>>> who knows that code better than me could point me in the right >>>> direction. >>>> >>> I'm afraid xend is basically unmaintained these days (which has caused >>> to become deprecated in current releases) AFAIK there aren't any people >>> around who know the code in any great detail. >>> >>> I don't recall having heard of anything along the lines of what you >>> report so I don't think it is a known problem. >>> >> Isn't this the same as the: >> test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 16 leak-check/check fail never pass >> test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 16 leak-check/check fail never pass >> > > Why do you think that? > > AFAIK this is checking for leaked files (not file descriptors) and > xenstore entries etc. Also it seems to pass for other test sequences > which also involve xend and migration. > > Ian. > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel > >