Re: [RFC] bbclass for automatic generation of binary recipes

[Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>]

On 05/08/2013 03:35 PM, Erik Botö wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/08/2013 02:36 PM, Erik Botö wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is it similar to meta/classes/package.bbclass ?
>>>>
>>>> // Robert
>>>
>>>
>>> I would say it's in addition to package.bbclass.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Erik,
>>
>> Sorry, I meant this one meta/classes/bin_package.bbclass :-)
>>
>> // Robert
>
> Oh, hadn't seen that one. That could definitely be useful, the only
> thing left to do is to try to automate the generation of the recipe
> that uses the binary package.
>

How about the scripts/create-recipe ? It works fine with the tarball, but
not very well with .rpm/.deb/ipk.

// Robert

> Thanks,
> Erik
>
>>
>>
>>> The idea is that the developers of the closed source software uses OE
>>> to build their software from source, and in this build process the
>>> files needed for a binary distribution in OE is automatically
>>> generated. These generated files can be distributed to others that
>>> wish to use that closed source software in OE. So it would use some of
>>> the output from package.bbclass, like the package split, but then
>>> generate some extra files.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Erik
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/08/2013 01:53 PM, Erik Botö wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Background:
>>>>> If you use OE to build software which includes e.g. a closed source
>>>>> library, but still want to others to be able to build software based
>>>>> on that library in a OE environment you would have to create recipes
>>>>> that contains a binary version of your library + headers manually.
>>>>> This would have to be done manually for each package, and as the
>>>>> development of the library continues the binary recipes will have to
>>>>> be manually updated to keep in sync.
>>>>>
>>>>> Idea:
>>>>> Create a new bbclass that handles this automatically as much as
>>>>> possible. The basic idea is to:
>>>>> - Create a tarball of ${WORKDIR}/image/ alternatively
>>>>>      ${WORKDIR}/packages-split/
>>>>> - By parsing the "source recipe", create a "binary recipe" that uses
>>>>> that tarball
>>>>>
>>>>> The binary recipe should work as a drop in replacement of the source
>>>>> recipe. This means that the other recipes depending on the closed
>>>>> source software shouldn't need to be adapted to work with one or the
>>>>> other.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like feedback on whether you think the idea is feasible, and if
>>>>> you think it could be useful for others. And anything else you think
>>>>> of.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Erik Botö
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>>>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>>>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>