From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 17914: tolerable FAIL
Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 09:52:52 +0100
Message-ID: <518A1264.4000809@eu.citrix.com>
References: <osstest-17914-mainreport@xen.org>
	<CAFLBxZa=gqSdfWzP3TTTzHdEEk7bA26RYKaaRfusm3RNq_P9bQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20872.56003.44067.402013@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<518927FC02000078000D3F24@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
	<20873.12110.383738.749147@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<518A10FB02000078000D435C@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
	<1368002011.26321.166.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <1368002011.26321.166.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, "Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@xen.org>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, "Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@xen.org>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 08/05/13 09:33, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 07:46 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 07.05.13 at 18:43, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>>> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 17914: tolerable FAIL"):
>>>> Ian, I see you also tagged the Xen tree, but unfortunately without
>>>> updating the hypervisor revision to -rc1? Was that intentional? It's
>>>> not a dramatic problem (and I don't see a need to withdraw and
>>>> redo the tag), but maybe worth an addition to the checklist.
>>> You mean XEN_EXTRAVERSION in xen/Makefile ?  I wasn't sure
>>> whether that ought to be changed.  It's on the checklist but I don't
>>> know what the usual practice is for an RC.
>> Keir updated that in the past for the RCs, but personally I don't
>> mind it remaining "-unstable" until the branching occurs.
> It would have been useful so that dmesg logs for people building from
> the tarball will contain the right version. People building from git/hg
> are less of a concern assuming the latest cset thing still works.

I don't think it does:

  \ \/ /___ _ __   | || |  |___ /    _   _ _ __  ___| |_ __ _| |__ | | ___
   \  // _ \ '_ \  | || |_   |_ \ __| | | | '_ \/ __| __/ _` | '_ \| |/ _ \
   /  \  __/ | | | |__   _| ___) |__| |_| | | | \__ \ || (_| | |_) | |  __/
  /_/\_\___|_| |_|    |_|(_)____/    \__,_|_| |_|___/\__\__,_|_.__/|_|\___|

(XEN) Xen version 4.3-unstable (root@) (gcc (Debian 4.7.2-5) 4.7.2) 
debug=y Thu May  2 16:29:11 BST 2013
(XEN) Latest ChangeSet: unavailable

# xl info
host                   : exile
[snip]
xen_changeset          : unavailable
[snip]
cc_compile_date        : Thu May  2 16:29:11 BST 2013

  -George