From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com (comal.ext.ti.com [198.47.26.152]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA20E01484 for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 08:10:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dflxv15.itg.ti.com ([128.247.5.124]) by comal.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id r48FAQgs024855 for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 10:10:27 -0500 Received: from DFLE72.ent.ti.com (dfle72.ent.ti.com [128.247.5.109]) by dflxv15.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r48FAQxD027210 for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 10:10:26 -0500 Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by DFLE72.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.109) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.3; Wed, 8 May 2013 10:10:26 -0500 Received: from [172.24.52.134] (h52-134.vpn.ti.com [172.24.52.134]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r48FAPse025185; Wed, 8 May 2013 10:10:25 -0500 Message-ID: <518A6B05.5000707@ti.com> Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 11:11:01 -0400 From: Tom Rini Organization: Texas Instruments User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Denys Dmytriyenko References: <1367961859-6243-1-git-send-email-m-karicheri2@ti.com> <1367961859-6243-2-git-send-email-m-karicheri2@ti.com> <20130507215205.GF12982@edge> <3E54258959B69E4282D79E01AB1F32B7044ED1DE@DFLE11.ent.ti.com> <20130507224012.GJ12982@edge> In-Reply-To: <20130507224012.GJ12982@edge> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Cc: "meta-ti@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [RESEND: PATCH 2/3] keystone2: u-boot: update to add gph support X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 15:10:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/07/2013 06:40 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 06:07:10PM -0400, Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: [snip] >>>>> + cd ${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE} >>>>> + rm -f ${UBOOT_BINARY} ${UBOOT_SYMLINK} >>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SYMLINK} >>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_BINARY} >>>>> + rm -f ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_BINARY} ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_SYMLINK} >>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_SYMLINK} >>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_BINARY} >>>>> + rm -f ${UBOOT_SPI_BINARY} ${UBOOT_SPI_SYMLINK} >>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_SYMLINK} >>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_BINARY} >>>>> + rm -f ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_BINARY} ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_SYMLINK} >>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_SYMLINK} >>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_BINARY} >>>>> +} >>>> >>>> As we just spoke - let's try to generalize this format and combine it with >>>> other similar requirements, like SPL-UART etc. There was a thread back in >>>> February about this... >> >> This is where I have disagreement. Let us restart the discussion. Who are >> the stake holders? Discuss it in this thread rather than using an old >> thread. I have copied here Carlos. I don't have bandwidth to spend too much >> time on this. Let us discuss it and identify what is required to be done. > > Sure, let's discuss. I encourage everyone to participate, especially Carlos > and Tom. We should try and get the generic u-boot.inc to allow for a few different variables to be set by the machine.conf file, and if they are, copy/symlink them as needed. I think we should try and fit the SPI selection into the generic u-boot-with-spl.bin framework that exists in u-boot today if we can, and then add some logic so that we can package and symlink that single file instead. -- Tom