From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com (arroyo.ext.ti.com [192.94.94.40]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F896E01484 for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 08:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dflxv15.itg.ti.com ([128.247.5.124]) by arroyo.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id r48FWxTH009386 for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 10:32:59 -0500 Received: from DLEE71.ent.ti.com (dlee71.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.114]) by dflxv15.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r48FWxOb006896 for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 10:32:59 -0500 Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by DLEE71.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.114) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.3; Wed, 8 May 2013 10:32:58 -0500 Received: from [158.218.103.10] (a0850405-off1.am.dhcp.ti.com [158.218.103.10]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r48FWwrn002870; Wed, 8 May 2013 10:32:58 -0500 Message-ID: <518A702A.6090704@ti.com> Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 11:32:58 -0400 From: Carlos Hernandez User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Rini References: <1367961859-6243-1-git-send-email-m-karicheri2@ti.com> <1367961859-6243-2-git-send-email-m-karicheri2@ti.com> <20130507215205.GF12982@edge> <3E54258959B69E4282D79E01AB1F32B7044ED1DE@DFLE11.ent.ti.com> <20130507224012.GJ12982@edge> <518A6B05.5000707@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <518A6B05.5000707@ti.com> Cc: "meta-ti@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [RESEND: PATCH 2/3] keystone2: u-boot: update to add gph support X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 15:33:00 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/08/2013 11:11 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > On 05/07/2013 06:40 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: >> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 06:07:10PM -0400, Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: > [snip] >>>>>> + cd ${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE} >>>>>> + rm -f ${UBOOT_BINARY} ${UBOOT_SYMLINK} >>>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SYMLINK} >>>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_BINARY} >>>>>> + rm -f ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_BINARY} ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_SYMLINK} >>>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_SYMLINK} >>>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_BINARY} >>>>>> + rm -f ${UBOOT_SPI_BINARY} ${UBOOT_SPI_SYMLINK} >>>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_SYMLINK} >>>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_BINARY} >>>>>> + rm -f ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_BINARY} ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_SYMLINK} >>>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_SYMLINK} >>>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_BINARY} >>>>>> +} >>>>> As we just spoke - let's try to generalize this format and combine it with >>>>> other similar requirements, like SPL-UART etc. There was a thread back in >>>>> February about this... >>> This is where I have disagreement. Let us restart the discussion. Who are >>> the stake holders? Discuss it in this thread rather than using an old >>> thread. I have copied here Carlos. I don't have bandwidth to spend too much >>> time on this. Let us discuss it and identify what is required to be done. >> Sure, let's discuss. I encourage everyone to participate, especially Carlos >> and Tom. > We should try and get the generic u-boot.inc to allow for a few > different variables to be set by the machine.conf file, and if they are, > copy/symlink them as needed. I think we should try and fit the SPI > selection into the generic u-boot-with-spl.bin framework that exists in > u-boot today if we can, and then add some logic so that we can package > and symlink that single file instead. > +1