From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:46735 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752999Ab3EIOoB (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 May 2013 10:44:01 -0400 Message-ID: <518BB62D.9060108@candelatech.com> (sfid-20130509_164410_786338_3FB3BFE6) Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 07:43:57 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sujith Manoharan CC: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Fun with QoS in AP mode. References: <5189DB72.3020809@candelatech.com> <20873.56643.216380.594657@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <518A6C21.5070408@candelatech.com> <20875.12412.946993.203664@gargle.gargle.HOWL> In-Reply-To: <20875.12412.946993.203664@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/08/2013 10:13 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote: > Ben Greear wrote: >> Yes, both AP and Station machine are ath9k, 3.9.0+, etc.... >> >> Basically identicaly hardware and software loads..just one is acting as AP >> and one as station(s) in this scenario. > > Works okay here. > > STA1 <-> AP <-> STA2 (ath9k stations, ath9k AP running OpenWrt trunk). We're running Fedora 17..maybe we have to configure some more routing/QoS logic to enable the feature on the AP side... Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com