From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] .gitignore: Add vim swap files Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 19:15:30 +0100 Message-ID: <518D3942.4060208@citrix.com> References: <1368116223-31218-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> <518BCDCA.7030902@citrix.com> <20877.14289.660009.193592@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20877.14289.660009.193592@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: Julien Grall , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "patches@linaro.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 10/05/13 19:09, Ian Jackson wrote: > Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [PATCH V2] .gitignore: Add vim swap files"): >> On 09/05/13 17:17, Julien Grall wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall >>> >>> Changes in v2: >>> - update .hgignore >> Much appreciated. >> >> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper > Nacked-by: Ian Jackson > >>> diff --git a/.hgignore b/.hgignore >>> index 6b432f7..4bd24fc 100644 >>> --- a/.hgignore >>> +++ b/.hgignore >>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ >>> .*\.tar\.bz2$ >>> .*\.tar\.gz$ >>> .*~$ >>> +.swp$ > AIUI the format of .hgignore files is lines containing > implicitly-^-anchored regexps. Nope - the documentation states otherwise http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/hgignore.5.html "Neither glob nor regexp patterns are rooted. A glob-syntax pattern of the form *.c will match a file ending in .c in any directory, and a regexp pattern of the form \.c$ will do the same. To root a regexp pattern, start it with ^." > > So this is wrong. Please copy the (hideous) syntax of the other > entries. It is wrong because it failes to escape the literal . (which admittedly I missed when reviewing it) Just because the rest of the .hgignore is wrong doesn't mean new additions shouldn't be. ~Andrew > > Furthermore, while it's good to update both ignore files I think it's > fine to update only one of them if that's what's annoying you. > > Ian.