From: dE <de.techno@gmail.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: pfifo_fast behavior.
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 14:15:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <518FA146.2070900@gmail.com> (raw)
Hello everyone!
I was trying to do some traffic shaping to make http pages more
responsive while torrenting. So I decided to modify TOS value of packets
to have an affect on the default pfifo_fast qdisc.
I've the following iptable rules --
#DNS request
iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -o eth1 -p udp -m multiport --dports 53 -j
TOS --set-tos 0x10
#DNS response
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p udp -m multiport --sports 53
-j TOS --set-tos 0x10
#Incoming torrent connections
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp -m multiport --dports
2000 -j TOS --set-tos 0x2
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p udp -m multiport --dports
2000,1900,2001 -j TOS --set-tos 0x2
#Mail server
iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -o eth1 -p tcp -d imap.googlemail.com -m
multiport --dports 993 -j TOS --set-tos 0x10
#HTTP(S)
iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -o eth1 -p tcp -m multiport --dports 80,443
-j TOS --set-tos 0x14
#iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -o eth1 -p tcp -m multiport --dports
80,443 -j TOS --set-tos 0x10
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp -m multiport --sport
80,443 -j TOS --set-tos 0x14
#iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp -m multiport --sport
80,443 -j TOS --set-tos 0x10
There is an improvement, but it's so little that it feels like placebo,
making me doubt the above action. So are the actions correct?
man tc-prio has a table --
TOS Bits Means Linux Priority Band
------------------------------------------------------------
0x0 0 Normal Service 0 Best Effort 1
0x2 1 Minimize Monetary Cost 1 Filler 2
0x4 2 Maximize Reliability 0 Best Effort 1
0x6 3 mmc+mr 0 Best Effort 1
0x8 4 Maximize Throughput 2 Bulk 2
0xa 5 mmc+mt 2 Bulk 2
0xc 6 mr+mt 2 Bulk 2
0xe 7 mmc+mr+mt 2 Bulk 2
0x10 8 Minimize Delay 6 Interactive 0
0x12 9 mmc+md 6 Interactive 0
0x14 10 mr+md 6 Interactive 0
0x16 11 mmc+mr+md 6 Interactive 0
0x18 12 mt+md 4 Int. Bulk 1
0x1a 13 mmc+mt+md 4 Int. Bulk 1
0x1c 14 mr+mt+md 4 Int. Bulk 1
0x1e 15 mmc+mr+mt+md 4 Int. Bulk 1
But is there a difference between all TOS values which fall in a single
band?
I mean, does the behavior of pfifo_fast change if I change from 0x12 to
0x16? Cause I thought the qdisc to be simple, and a different behavior
for all of the above TOS values means pfifo_fast does a lot more than
just placing packets in 3 different queues.
Another question -- how do you get these TOS values? and what does -j
TOS --set-tos <HEX/DEC> do? Does it modify the 4 bits or the whole 8 bit
TOS value in the header, or does something completely different?
I'm running a custom kernel with Gentoo OS.
next reply other threads:[~2013-05-12 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-12 14:15 dE [this message]
2013-05-13 17:49 ` pfifo_fast behavior Benjamin Kiessling
2013-05-15 2:33 ` dE
2013-05-16 6:48 ` dE
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=518FA146.2070900@gmail.com \
--to=de.techno@gmail.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.