From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <5191EE9E.5030100@xenomai.org> Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 09:58:22 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5191360D.6070801@xenomai.org> <5191EA44.5080307@control.lth.se> <5191ED35.8010904@xenomai.org> In-Reply-To: <5191ED35.8010904@xenomai.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] timeline for 2.6.2.2? List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anders Blomdell Cc: "Daniel M. Drucker, Ph.D." , xenomai@xenomai.org On 05/14/2013 09:52 AM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 05/14/2013 09:39 AM, Anders Blomdell wrote: > >> On 2013-05-13 20:50, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>> On 05/13/2013 05:18 PM, Daniel M. Drucker, Ph.D. wrote: >>> >>>> Is there a planned 2.6.2.2? Could there be? >>>> >>>> There are a few fixes since 2.6.2.1 we want, and it would ease our release >>>> process a huge amount if we could use a released version instead of git >>>> head. >>> >>> >>> 2.6.3 is the next release. A todo list has been published here: >>> http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2013-April/028147.html >> Says: >> - x86: 3.5.7 with intel graphic card, try and find the source of high >> latencies >> >> does this say that 2.6.3 ipipe will be based on 3.5.7? Then I'll have >> better to try track down the issue in: >> >> http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2013-March/027963.html > > > It will have a patch for 3.8, but the issue has been reported on 3.5.7, > but can be reproduced on 3.8. > I thought the issue you quote was solved? And a Xenomai release is not tied with any particular release of the I-pipe patch and supposed to support all the past I-pipe releases. There just so happens that it is better tested with the latests I-pipe patch it ships with. -- Gilles.