From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from nm5-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.207]:35990 "HELO
	nm5-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752627Ab3ENPbE (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 14 May 2013 11:31:04 -0400
Message-ID: <519258A7.4080503@influence-pc.fr>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 17:30:47 +0200
From: Vincent <vincent@influence-pc.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Remove a materially failed device from a Btrfs "single-raid"
 using partitions
References: <5190F59F.405@influence-pc.fr> <CAFWF=akT1vSPSXkAKCf9y3Ej63XSmBGC_MZKk0BCRxz2diCHFg@mail.gmail.com> <5190F9C7.1080904@influence-pc.fr> <CAFWF=ak4mKMgNZHx6pxuhY7pCEE0G-aifGNi_zRX5zyAUh7n-g@mail.gmail.com> <5191071B.7090209@influence-pc.fr> <5741BE95-3287-4054-A3AE-EC9CE4A26909@colorremedies.com>
In-Reply-To: <5741BE95-3287-4054-A3AE-EC9CE4A26909@colorremedies.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

Why is it more easier to extend a Brfs partition rather than to reduce 
it, while the single raid is supposed to be made ​​for that?