From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from r-finger.com (r-finger.com [178.79.160.5]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16708E013A3 for ; Wed, 15 May 2013 02:29:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (host86-137-102-112.range86-137.btcentralplus.com [86.137.102.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by r-finger.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFAE5952B for ; Wed, 15 May 2013 10:29:41 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <51935584.9030908@r-finger.com> Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 10:29:40 +0100 From: Tomas Frydrych User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.5) Gecko/20120624 Icedove/10.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yocto@yoctoproject.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [meta-raspberrypi] Thoughts on Raspberry Pi firmware X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 09:29:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 14/05/13 13:09, Paul Barker wrote: > Secondly, is there any use case for building vc-graphics or > vc-graphics-hardfp to provide virtual/egl and virtual/libgles2 > (which rely on binary files from the raspberry pi firmware repo) > instead of compiling from source using the userland package? It would be preferable if we could build these from source; last time I tried (which, admittedly, is a long while back), this was not possible because of some missing broadcom-specific header files that seemed not available anywhere, but I guess this is no longer the case. Tomas -- http://sleepfive.com