From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Ripard Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 10:18:14 +0200 Message-ID: <51949646.4000107@free-electrons.com> References: <1368545933-7430-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <201305151455.12603.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201305151455.12603.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Michal Simek , Linus Walleij , Jamie Iles , Simon Horman , Magnus Damm , Christian Daudt , Viresh Kumar , David Brown , Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Gregory Clement , Shawn Guo , Barry Song , Tony Prisk , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Olof Johansson List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnd, Le 15/05/2013 14:55, Arnd Bergmann a =E9crit : > On Tuesday 14 May 2013, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> This is a splitted up version of the patch I previously sent to >> remove the explicit declaration of irqchip_init as the init_irq call= back in >> the machine descriptions. >> >> Since it was a pretty tricky patch to merge, since it was touching a= lot of >> different platforms, I splitted it for each platforms, and rebased i= t on top >> of 3.10-rc1. >> >> The best way to merge it is probably that each one of us take into t= heir tree >> the patches that are relevant for our architecture and send them to = arm-soc >> later on. >=20 > Sounds good to me. I'm sure that some platform maintainers will fail = to > apply this though. Could you send whatever remains as a separate bran= ch > in a couple of weeks so we can directly apply it to next/cleanup? Ok, I will. Thanks, Maxime --=20 Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Ripard Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 08:18:14 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Message-Id: <51949646.4000107@free-electrons.com> List-Id: References: <1368545933-7430-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <201305151455.12603.arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: <201305151455.12603.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Hi Arnd, Le 15/05/2013 14:55, Arnd Bergmann a =E9crit : > On Tuesday 14 May 2013, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> This is a splitted up version of the patch I previously sent to >> remove the explicit declaration of irqchip_init as the init_irq callback= in >> the machine descriptions. >> >> Since it was a pretty tricky patch to merge, since it was touching a lot= of >> different platforms, I splitted it for each platforms, and rebased it on= top >> of 3.10-rc1. >> >> The best way to merge it is probably that each one of us take into their= tree >> the patches that are relevant for our architecture and send them to arm-= soc >> later on. >=20 > Sounds good to me. I'm sure that some platform maintainers will fail to > apply this though. Could you send whatever remains as a separate branch > in a couple of weeks so we can directly apply it to next/cleanup? Ok, I will. Thanks, Maxime --=20 Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 10:18:14 +0200 Subject: [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls In-Reply-To: <201305151455.12603.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1368545933-7430-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <201305151455.12603.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <51949646.4000107@free-electrons.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Arnd, Le 15/05/2013 14:55, Arnd Bergmann a ?crit : > On Tuesday 14 May 2013, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> This is a splitted up version of the patch I previously sent to >> remove the explicit declaration of irqchip_init as the init_irq callback in >> the machine descriptions. >> >> Since it was a pretty tricky patch to merge, since it was touching a lot of >> different platforms, I splitted it for each platforms, and rebased it on top >> of 3.10-rc1. >> >> The best way to merge it is probably that each one of us take into their tree >> the patches that are relevant for our architecture and send them to arm-soc >> later on. > > Sounds good to me. I'm sure that some platform maintainers will fail to > apply this though. Could you send whatever remains as a separate branch > in a couple of weeks so we can directly apply it to next/cleanup? Ok, I will. Thanks, Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com