From: Steve Lawrence <slawrence@tresys.com>
To: SELinux List <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Future of SETools and CIL
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 09:33:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5194E01F.2040505@tresys.com> (raw)
It has become clear that SETools has fallen behind userspace in terms of
features and general maintenance. We would like to get it to the point
where this is not the case, and to find a way to make sure it does not
happen again. We think the solution to the maintenance issue is to make
it more visible by merging the more useful parts of SETools into the
userspace repo, while deprecating/removing the remaining pieces.
However, we are well aware of the complexity of SETools, primarily
libapol, and that upstreaming it without any changes would not solve the
problems. So, we have done a little work behind the scenes to find a way
to reduce the complexity of libapol. As a first stab at it, we started
with an older version of libapol that is quite a bit less complex and
began porting it forward for use with modern userspace, and seeing if it
would make sense to eventually merge. But before we get too deep into
this port, we wanted to start a discussion with the SELinux community to
make sure we are headed in the right direction. So to start, does this
seem like a good idea (both merging with userspace and porting older
libapol)? Or should we take a completely different direction (e.g. the
use of graphing databases as a replacement of apol has been mentioned in
the past)?
Another discussion we would like to have, which may affect the future of
SETools/apol, is CIL. Is there still interest in CIL? And if so, have
there been any thoughts on using and migrating to CIL? Is more work
needed before this can happen? Has anyone put thought into higher level
languages that could sit on top of CIL? If there is interest, this may
affect the SETools changes, for example, syntactic policy analysis for
CIL is likely very different than current policy.
Thanks,
- Steve
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
next reply other threads:[~2013-05-16 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-16 13:33 Steve Lawrence [this message]
2013-05-16 14:10 ` Future of SETools and CIL Daniel J Walsh
2013-05-23 18:32 ` Steve Lawrence
2013-05-24 13:22 ` Daniel J Walsh
2013-05-16 14:46 ` James Carter
2013-05-23 18:43 ` Steve Lawrence
2013-05-23 19:43 ` James Carter
2013-05-23 20:24 ` Steve Lawrence
2013-05-16 16:37 ` Stephen Smalley
2013-05-23 18:28 ` Steve Lawrence
2013-05-17 12:42 ` Sven Vermeulen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5194E01F.2040505@tresys.com \
--to=slawrence@tresys.com \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.