From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dirk Brandewie Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Power management and ACPI fixes for v3.10-rc2 Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 16:36:12 -0700 Message-ID: <51956D6C.7090005@intel.com> References: <68458966.ga8OpWyZtA@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f48.google.com ([209.85.160.48]:36995 "EHLO mail-pb0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752045Ab3EPXgP (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2013 19:36:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM list , ACPI Devel Maling List , LKML On 05/16/2013 03:25 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> - intel_pstate driver fixes and cleanups from Dirk Brandewie and >> Wei Yongjun. > > Btw, is there some fundamental reason why the pstate driver is limited > to so few models? > > I've tested it on models 0x25 (i5-670) and 0x3a (i5-3427U), and it > seems to work. But neither model is listed. (only 0x2a and 0x2d are). > > I understand that people want to be careful, but it's not actually > getting very much *testing* right now, is it? Are models 0x2a/0x2d > actually special in any way? > No they are not I will send the patch out in the morning. > Linus >