From: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
To: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Cc: "xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 311: fsck the dmflakey device instead of the real device V2
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 07:00:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51961BE0.2080708@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130516203035.GE1765@localhost.localdomain>
On 05/16/2013 03:30 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 08:04:20AM -0600, Rich Johnston wrote:
>> On 05/15/2013 10:20 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>> Dave pointed out that xfs was having issues with 311 because of caching issues.
>>> He suggested that I fsck the dm-flakey device to make sure we don't have this
>>> problem. Make _check_scratch_fs take an optional argument to use as the device
>>> to fsck. Thanks,
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
>>> ---
>> Hi Josef,
>>
>> Looks like it fails test 19 , are we supposed to see failures for ext4
>> and xfs?
>>
>
> Yeah that's what I was seeing, if you run the fsync tester without the reboot
> option and look at the file itself it should match the md5sum thats in the good
> output. Thanks,
>
> Josef
>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-17 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-15 15:20 [PATCH] xfstests: 311: fsck the dmflakey device instead of the real device V2 Josef Bacik
2013-05-15 21:32 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-16 14:04 ` Rich Johnston
2013-05-16 20:30 ` Josef Bacik
2013-05-17 12:00 ` Rich Johnston [this message]
2013-05-17 12:02 ` Rich Johnston
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51961BE0.2080708@sgi.com \
--to=rjohnston@sgi.com \
--cc=jbacik@fusionio.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.