From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57002) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeRdK-0002RV-TU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 11:04:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeRdF-00014U-UC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 11:04:18 -0400 Received: from v220110690675601.yourvserver.net ([78.47.199.172]:43685) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeRdF-00014N-N4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 11:04:13 -0400 Message-ID: <519A3B68.1070009@weilnetz.de> Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 17:04:08 +0200 From: Stefan Weil MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <519A0268.7050308@redhat.com> <519A08F2.1020007@weilnetz.de> <519A09AE.5080205@redhat.com> <87zjvp25ym.fsf@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <87zjvp25ym.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] pending 1.5 patches List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel Am 20.05.2013 14:25, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > Paolo Bonzini writes: > >> Il 20/05/2013 13:28, Stefan Weil ha scritto: >>> Am 20.05.2013 13:00, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: >>>> I see the following patches on the list that IMO deserve inclusion into >>>> 1.5. All of them should be low-risk. >>>> >>>> <1368718348-15199-1-git-send-email-emaste@freebsd.org> >>>> [PATCH v2] Rename hexdump to avoid FreeBSD libutil conflict >>>> >>>> <1369046780-17498-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> >>>> [PATCH for-1.5 resend] vl: new runstate transition: >>>> RUN_STATE_GUEST_PANICKED -> RUN_STATE_FINISH_MIGRATE >>>> >>>> <1369045989-14016-1-git-send-email-hpoussin@reactos.org> >>>> [PATCH for-1.5] osdep: fix qemu_anon_ram_free trace (+ fix compilation >>>> on 32 bit hosts) >>> See also http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/244757/ >> Yes, they are identical. >> >>>> <1369032665-18159-2-git-send-email-lilei@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >>>> [PATCH 1/3] chardev: Make consistent with udp device for new qapi backend >>>> (not the rest of the series) >>>> >>>> There is also <20130520081814.GA8162@redhat.com>, but I think it's >>>> too intrusive. >>> Plus this one, please: >>> >>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/244758/ >>> spitz: Fix compiler warning (MinGW-w64) >> Agreed. > We don't build with -Werror on MinGW-w64 so a warning fix is very low > priority. It needs to wait for stable. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori I don't mind waiting. For your information: MinGW-w64 normally should compile without warnings when a recent set of MinGW-w64 include files is used. Please don't forget http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/244757/ _before_ Paolo's list. Thanks, Stefan Weil