From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1UeTgI-00070x-RP for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 13:15:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43830) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeTgA-0006ji-Ta for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 13:15:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeTg5-00067G-Hl for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 13:15:22 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:20419) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeTfv-00062A-Sa; Mon, 20 May 2013 13:15:08 -0400 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4KHF5gr016195 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 20 May 2013 13:15:05 -0400 Received: from yakj.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-112-19.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.19]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r4KHEtBn025657; Mon, 20 May 2013 13:15:02 -0400 Message-ID: <519A5A0B.9050301@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 19:14:51 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Maydell References: <1369066884-431-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <519A50EE.8040804@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.11 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Cc: Anthony Liguori , patches@linaro.org, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, John Rigby , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] qapi-schema.json: Reformat TargetType enum to one-per-line X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 17:15:28 -0000 Il 20/05/2013 18:38, Peter Maydell ha scritto: >> > I have queued a patch for 1.6 that would change this field to a free >> > string. There is no use of this enum, not even for introspection. You >> > don't need to know what targets were supported in the version that you >> > compiled from. Only one target is supported in this executable anyway. > That sounds like a better solution. Do you have a pointer to the > patch? I tried a quick list archive search but probably didn't > use the right keywords. No, I haven't quite tested it enough. I'll send an RFC shortly, as soon as compilation finishes. Paolo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43762) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeTg0-0006Rw-N6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 13:15:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeTfw-00062S-35 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 13:15:12 -0400 Message-ID: <519A5A0B.9050301@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 19:14:51 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1369066884-431-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <519A50EE.8040804@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qapi-schema.json: Reformat TargetType enum to one-per-line List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Anthony Liguori , patches@linaro.org, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, John Rigby , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= Il 20/05/2013 18:38, Peter Maydell ha scritto: >> > I have queued a patch for 1.6 that would change this field to a free >> > string. There is no use of this enum, not even for introspection. You >> > don't need to know what targets were supported in the version that you >> > compiled from. Only one target is supported in this executable anyway. > That sounds like a better solution. Do you have a pointer to the > patch? I tried a quick list archive search but probably didn't > use the right keywords. No, I haven't quite tested it enough. I'll send an RFC shortly, as soon as compilation finishes. Paolo