From: Darren Hart <darren.hart@intel.com>
To: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Ashfield, Bruce" <Bruce.Ashfield@windriver.com>,
Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>,
bitbake-devel <bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org>,
Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fetch2: Shorten long srcrevs
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 11:23:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <519A6A18.3050802@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369038832.1619.3.camel@ted>
On 05/20/2013 01:33 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 14:32 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
>> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 01:21:55PM +0300, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>> The long srcrevs are mainly used or the workdir construction as well as
>>> the package version. The long entries are hashes generated by the git fetcher
>>> and other scms using a similar revision mechanism.
>>>
>>> We need these to change when the package changes however collisions are
>>> unlikely to happen within the domains we care about. The long revisions
>>> have generated negative user feedback due to the use in path and file
>>> names.
>>>
>>> This patch therefore truncates the revisions to 10 characters maximum.
>>
>> What about 7 characters like git log --oneline is using?
>
> git uses varying lengths depending on whether it detects collisions. I
> really don't want to have to do the collision detection or worry about
> this so 10 characters seemed like a nice number, its short enough to
> address the complaints but long enough to avoid problems.
Exactly. 10 seems like a good choice to me as well, it significantly
reduces the path length while keeping the implementation simple and
minimizing the chances of collisions.
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-20 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-19 10:21 [PATCH] fetch2: Shorten long srcrevs Richard Purdie
2013-05-19 12:32 ` Martin Jansa
2013-05-20 8:33 ` Richard Purdie
2013-05-20 18:23 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2013-05-19 16:02 ` Bruce Ashfield
2013-05-19 17:07 ` Darren Hart
2013-05-22 19:51 ` Martin Jansa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=519A6A18.3050802@intel.com \
--to=darren.hart@intel.com \
--cc=Bruce.Ashfield@windriver.com \
--cc=bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=koen@dominion.thruhere.net \
--cc=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.